PAMC vs. KMID

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

PAMC (Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF) and KMID (Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. PAMC is passively managed, while KMID is actively managed. Over the past year, PAMC returned 25.97% vs 2.35% for KMID. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PAMC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for KMID.

Performance

PAMC vs. KMID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF (KMID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAMC achieves a 15.63% return, which is significantly higher than KMID's 2.71% return.

PAMC

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -0.96%
• 6M: 11.11%
• YTD: 15.63%
• 1Y: 25.97%
• 3Y*: 15.21%
• 5Y*: 9.60%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.20%

KMID

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: -0.74%
• 6M: -0.83%
• YTD: 2.71%
• 1Y: 2.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -0.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
KMID Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF	$279.42K	$262.02K	$293.43K
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF	$146.26K	$127.92K	$342.42K

PAMC vs. KMID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF	15.63%	1.54%	-0.39%
KMID Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF	2.71%	0.31%	-3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between PAMC and KMID is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2024	0.76

The correlation between PAMC and KMID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

PAMC vs. KMID - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PAMC	KMID
Industrials	23.2%	45.2%
Financial Services	19.8%	9.4%
Consumer Cyclical	12.5%	4.7%
Technology	10.8%	18.6%
Energy	7.8%	-
Real Estate	6.8%	-
Healthcare	5.8%	14.0%
Basic Materials	5.5%	-
Utilities	3.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.4%	-
Communication Services	0.8%	-

Return for Risk

PAMC vs. KMID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PAMC

PAMC Risk / Return Rank: 58
PAMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
PAMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
PAMC Omega Ratio Rank: 52
PAMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
PAMC Martin Ratio Rank: 69

KMID

KMID Risk / Return Rank: 14
KMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
KMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
KMID Omega Ratio Rank: 13
KMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
KMID Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PAMC vs. KMID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF (KMID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PAMC	KMID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	0.13	+1.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	0.30	+1.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.03	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.33	0.18	+2.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.42	0.51	+7.91

PAMC vs. KMID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is higher than the KMID Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAMC and KMID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PAMC vs. KMID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAMC drawdown since its inception was -27.04%, which is greater than KMID's maximum drawdown of -18.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAMC and KMID.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAMC	KMID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.04%	-18.89%	-8.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.24%	-10.71%	+0.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.30%	-4.49%	+1.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.32%	-5.64%	-1.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.83%	3.72%	-0.89%

Volatility

PAMC vs. KMID - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) has a higher volatility of 4.30% compared to Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF (KMID) at 3.59%. This indicates that PAMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAMC	KMID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.30%	3.59%	+0.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.15%	11.57%	+2.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.94%	14.97%	+3.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.21%	16.73%	+3.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.62%	16.73%	+3.89%

PAMC vs. KMID - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAMC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than KMID's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

PAMC vs. KMID - Dividend Comparison

PAMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, more than KMID's 0.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
KMID Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF	0.11%	0.06%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF	1.12%	1.11%	0.97%	0.69%	1.29%	0.36%	0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAMC and KMID in my portfolio?

PAMC and KMID have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PAMC or KMID?

PAMC has higher volatility (4.30%) compared to KMID (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAMC dropped -27.04% vs KMID's -18.89%.

Which ETF is better, PAMC or KMID?

On 1-year performance, PAMC leads with 25.97% vs 2.35% for KMID. On fees, PAMC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, KMID has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PAMC or KMID?

Over the 1-year period, PAMC has performed better with a 25.97% return vs 2.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PAMC or KMID?

PAMC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for KMID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PAMC or KMID?

PAMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.11% for KMID.

What is the main difference between PAMC and KMID?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Virtus. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PAMC and 0.80% for KMID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PAMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.