PAMC vs. COWG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG).

PAMC and COWG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PAMC is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2020. COWG is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index. It was launched on Dec 21, 2022. Both PAMC and COWG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

PAMC vs. COWG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PAMC vs. COWG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF	4.43%	1.54%	26.20%	19.30%	0.43%
COWG Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	-3.92%	10.24%	34.99%	20.69%	-0.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAMC achieves a 4.43% return, which is significantly higher than COWG's -3.92% return.

PAMC

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: -4.41%
• YTD: 4.43%
• 6M: 4.06%
• 1Y: 15.41%
• 3Y*: 14.52%
• 5Y*: 7.43%
• 10Y*: —

COWG

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: -4.35%
• YTD: -3.92%
• 6M: -7.05%
• 1Y: 9.21%
• 3Y*: 18.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAMC vs. COWG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAMC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than COWG's 0.49% expense ratio.

PAMC

Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF

COWG

Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF

Return for Risk

PAMC vs. COWG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAMC

PAMC Risk / Return Rank: 39
PAMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
PAMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
PAMC Omega Ratio Rank: 36
PAMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
PAMC Martin Ratio Rank: 45

COWG

COWG Risk / Return Rank: 26
COWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
COWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
COWG Omega Ratio Rank: 24
COWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
COWG Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAMC vs. COWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PAMC	COWG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.71	0.41	+0.30
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.14	0.74	+0.40
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.10	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.18	0.79	+0.39
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.56	2.55	+2.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PAMC vs. COWG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAMC Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is higher than the COWG Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAMC and COWG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PAMC	COWG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71	0.41	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.93	-0.26

Correlation

The correlation between PAMC and COWG is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

PAMC vs. COWG - Dividend Comparison

PAMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than COWG's 0.35% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF	1.24%	1.11%	0.97%	0.69%	1.29%	0.36%	0.30%
COWG Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	0.35%	0.32%	0.40%	0.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

PAMC vs. COWG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAMC drawdown since its inception was -27.04%, which is greater than COWG's maximum drawdown of -23.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAMC and COWG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAMC	COWG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.04%	-23.60%	-3.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.60%	-12.96%	-0.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.89%	-7.98%	+3.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.66%	-3.36%	-4.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.53%	4.00%	-0.47%

Volatility

PAMC vs. COWG - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) has a higher volatility of 9.01% compared to Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) at 5.87%. This indicates that PAMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAMC	COWG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.01%	5.87%	+3.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.73%	13.24%	+1.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.65%	22.50%	-0.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.42%	19.32%	+1.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.82%	19.32%	+1.50%