PAMC vs. ARKQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ).
PAMC and ARKQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PAMC is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2020. ARKQ is an actively managed fund by ARK. It was launched on Sep 30, 2014.
Performance
PAMC vs. ARKQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PAMC vs. ARKQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 2.88% | 1.54% | 26.20% | 19.30% | -12.15% | 13.15% | 34.03% |
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | -1.93% | 48.81% | 33.88% | 40.70% | -46.75% | 1.74% | 66.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAMC achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly higher than ARKQ's -1.93% return.
PAMC
- 1D
- 4.11%
- 1M
- -4.94%
- YTD
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 2.73%
- 1Y
- 14.36%
- 3Y*
- 13.95%
- 5Y*
- 7.11%
- 10Y*
- —
ARKQ
- 1D
- 5.63%
- 1M
- -8.16%
- YTD
- -1.93%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- 70.15%
- 3Y*
- 30.88%
- 5Y*
- 5.97%
- 10Y*
- 20.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PAMC vs. ARKQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAMC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKQ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PAMC vs. ARKQ — Risk / Return Rank
PAMC
ARKQ
PAMC vs. ARKQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAMC | ARKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.67 | 1.93 | -1.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.08 | 2.54 | -1.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.32 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 3.31 | -2.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.20 | 10.41 | -6.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAMC | ARKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 1.93 | -1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.19 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.60 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between PAMC and ARKQ is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PAMC vs. ARKQ - Dividend Comparison
PAMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, more than ARKQ's 0.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 1.26% | 1.11% | 0.97% | 0.69% | 1.29% | 0.36% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | 0.27% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 2.86% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.98% |
Drawdowns
PAMC vs. ARKQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAMC drawdown since its inception was -27.04%, smaller than the maximum ARKQ drawdown of -59.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAMC and ARKQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAMC | ARKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.04% | -59.89% | +32.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.60% | -20.58% | +6.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.04% | -55.71% | +28.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.30% | -16.11% | +9.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.66% | -17.43% | +9.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.52% | 6.53% | -3.01% |
Volatility
PAMC vs. ARKQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) is 9.01%, while ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) has a volatility of 11.82%. This indicates that PAMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PAMC | ARKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.01% | 11.82% | -2.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.66% | 25.86% | -11.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.61% | 36.50% | -14.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.42% | 31.95% | -11.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.82% | 29.63% | -8.81% |