AFMC vs. FLQM

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

AFMC (First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF) and FLQM (Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. AFMC is actively managed, while FLQM is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AFMC returned 10.83%/yr vs 7.28%/yr for FLQM. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. AFMC charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for FLQM.

Performance

AFMC vs. FLQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFMC achieves a 18.05% return, which is significantly higher than FLQM's 7.46% return.

AFMC

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.74%
• 6M: 13.07%
• YTD: 18.05%
• 1Y: 28.37%
• 3Y*: 17.45%
• 5Y*: 10.83%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.25%

FLQM

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 1.32%
• 6M: 6.05%
• YTD: 7.46%
• 1Y: 12.52%
• 3Y*: 10.57%
• 5Y*: 7.28%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AFMC First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF	$1.44M	$1.57M	$1.21M
FLQM Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	$4.73M	$5.15M	$5.86M

AFMC vs. FLQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AFMC First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF	18.05%	10.23%	19.06%	21.46%	-15.55%	25.75%	5.87%	1.97%
FLQM Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	7.46%	5.16%	14.32%	17.47%	-12.95%	28.76%	15.50%	3.69%

Correlation

The correlation between AFMC and FLQM is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2019	0.89

The correlation between AFMC and FLQM shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AFMC vs. FLQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AFMC	FLQM
Technology	21.7%	11.7%
Industrials	18.3%	17.7%
Consumer Cyclical	14.4%	15.4%
Financial Services	11.0%	16.9%
Healthcare	11.0%	15.2%
Real Estate	6.5%	3.6%
Basic Materials	6.1%	1.1%
Consumer Defensive	3.8%	8.9%
Energy	3.8%	5.0%
Communication Services	1.5%	2.4%
Utilities	1.1%	2.1%

Return for Risk

AFMC vs. FLQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AFMC

AFMC Risk / Return Rank: 82
AFMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
AFMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
AFMC Omega Ratio Rank: 78
AFMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
AFMC Martin Ratio Rank: 86

FLQM

FLQM Risk / Return Rank: 39
FLQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
FLQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
FLQM Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FLQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
FLQM Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AFMC vs. FLQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AFMC	FLQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	0.94	+0.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	1.51	+1.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.17	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.35	1.55	+1.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.18	4.31	+7.87

AFMC vs. FLQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the FLQM Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFMC and FLQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AFMC vs. FLQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFMC drawdown since its inception was -42.14%, which is greater than FLQM's maximum drawdown of -37.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFMC and FLQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	AFMC	FLQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.14%	-37.26%	-4.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.20%	-7.57%	-0.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.99%	-19.70%	-2.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.40%	-22.51%	-2.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.98%	-2.04%	+1.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.45%	-4.86%	-2.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.25%	2.72%	-0.47%

Volatility

AFMC vs. FLQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC) is 2.96%, while Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that AFMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AFMC	FLQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.96%	4.57%	-1.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.01%	9.01%	+2.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.00%	12.49%	+2.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.84%	16.45%	+2.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.74%	18.41%	+4.33%

AFMC vs. FLQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFMC has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FLQM's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

AFMC vs. FLQM - Dividend Comparison

AFMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than FLQM's 1.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AFMC First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF	0.69%	0.96%	0.64%	0.87%	1.42%	0.84%	1.05%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%
FLQM Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	1.64%	1.49%	1.28%	1.27%	1.33%	1.05%	1.10%	1.37%	1.42%	1.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AFMC and FLQM in my portfolio?

AFMC and FLQM have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AFMC or FLQM?

FLQM has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to AFMC (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFMC dropped -42.14% vs FLQM's -37.26%.

Which ETF is better, AFMC or FLQM?

On 5-year performance, AFMC leads with 10.83% vs 7.28% for FLQM. On fees, FLQM is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, AFMC has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AFMC or FLQM?

Over the 5-year period, AFMC has performed better with a 10.83% return vs 7.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AFMC or FLQM?

FLQM is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for AFMC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AFMC or FLQM?

FLQM has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.69% for AFMC.

What is the main difference between AFMC and FLQM?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for AFMC and 0.30% for FLQM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AFMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.