PortfoliosLab logo
AFMC vs. VUG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AFMC and VUG is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

AFMC vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%120.00%140.00%160.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
62.43%
129.56%
AFMC
VUG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AFMC:

0.23

VUG:

0.56

Sortino Ratio

AFMC:

0.48

VUG:

0.91

Omega Ratio

AFMC:

1.06

VUG:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

AFMC:

0.22

VUG:

0.59

Martin Ratio

AFMC:

0.67

VUG:

2.01

Ulcer Index

AFMC:

7.12%

VUG:

6.71%

Daily Std Dev

AFMC:

20.80%

VUG:

24.81%

Max Drawdown

AFMC:

-42.14%

VUG:

-50.68%

Current Drawdown

AFMC:

-11.22%

VUG:

-9.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFMC achieves a -2.59% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's -5.35% return.


AFMC

YTD

-2.59%

1M

13.81%

6M

-8.88%

1Y

4.69%

5Y*

15.67%

10Y*

N/A

VUG

YTD

-5.35%

1M

17.75%

6M

-4.30%

1Y

13.74%

5Y*

16.72%

10Y*

14.66%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AFMC vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFMC has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AFMC vs. VUG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFMC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AFMC is 3636
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AFMC is 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AFMC is 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AFMC is 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AFMC is 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AFMC is 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VUG is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VUG is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VUG is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VUG is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VUG is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VUG is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AFMC vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current AFMC Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFMC and VUG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.23
0.56
AFMC
VUG

Dividends

AFMC vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

AFMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, more than VUG's 0.50% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AFMC
First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF
0.84%0.65%0.87%1.42%0.84%1.05%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.50%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%1.21%

Drawdowns

AFMC vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFMC drawdown since its inception was -42.14%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFMC and VUG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-11.22%
-9.15%
AFMC
VUG

Volatility

AFMC vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC) is 9.78%, while Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a volatility of 13.61%. This indicates that AFMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
9.78%
13.61%
AFMC
VUG