PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAM vs. VNOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PAM vs. VNOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pampa Energía S.A. (PAM) and Viper Energy Partners LP (VNOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAM achieves a -0.03% return, which is significantly lower than VNOM's 17.90% return. Over the past 10 years, PAM has underperformed VNOM with an annualized return of 13.08%, while VNOM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.67% annualized return.


PAM

1D
0.17%
1M
11.49%
YTD
-0.03%
6M
0.08%
1Y
18.80%
3Y*
31.91%
5Y*
39.46%
10Y*
13.08%

VNOM

1D
1.56%
1M
-9.39%
YTD
17.90%
6M
12.90%
1Y
10.29%
3Y*
28.28%
5Y*
26.04%
10Y*
15.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAM vs. VNOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAM
Pampa Energía S.A.
-0.03%0.65%77.58%55.04%51.30%53.19%-16.13%-48.35%-52.72%93.28%
VNOM
Viper Energy Partners LP
17.90%-16.58%65.52%4.83%61.69%94.24%-50.69%0.66%19.60%55.99%

Correlation

The correlation between PAM and VNOM is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2014

0.21

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PAM:

$4.81B

VNOM:

$8.05B

EPS

PAM:

$8.05

VNOM:

-$0.29

PS Ratio

PAM:

2.23

VNOM:

4.34

PB Ratio

PAM:

1.27

VNOM:

1.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

PAM:

$2.16B

VNOM:

$1.60B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PAM:

$682.00M

VNOM:

$740.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

PAM:

$1.22B

VNOM:

$1.04B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAM vs. VNOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAM
PAM Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
PAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAM Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
PAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAM Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

VNOM
VNOM Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
VNOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNOM Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VNOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNOM Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAM vs. VNOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pampa Energía S.A. (PAM) and Viper Energy Partners LP (VNOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAMVNOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.10

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

0.95

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.23

1.64

-0.41

PAM vs. VNOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAM Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the VNOM Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAM and VNOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAM vs. VNOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAM drawdown since its inception was -87.41%, roughly equal to the maximum VNOM drawdown of -86.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAM and VNOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAMVNOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.41%

-86.96%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.59%

-14.09%

-17.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.40%

-34.46%

-5.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.40%

-34.46%

-5.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.41%

-86.96%

-0.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.75%

-14.66%

+7.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.47%

-31.64%

-10.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.89%

8.18%

+4.71%

Volatility

PAM vs. VNOM - Volatility Comparison

Pampa Energía S.A. (PAM) has a higher volatility of 10.62% compared to Viper Energy Partners LP (VNOM) at 7.16%. This indicates that PAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VNOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAMVNOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.62%

7.16%

+3.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.49%

19.95%

+4.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.19%

29.28%

+21.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.29%

35.89%

+10.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.94%

45.21%

+6.73%

Dividends

PAM vs. VNOM - Dividend Comparison

PAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VNOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PAM
Pampa Energía S.A.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VNOM
Viper Energy Partners LP
5.21%6.03%4.89%5.58%7.68%5.16%5.85%7.38%8.14%5.27%4.83%6.16%

Financials

PAM vs. VNOM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pampa Energía S.A. and Viper Energy Partners LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
573.00M
496.00M
(PAM) Total Revenue
(VNOM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PAM vs. VNOM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Pampa Energía S.A. and Viper Energy Partners LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
33.7%
51.4%
Portfolio components
PAM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pampa Energía S.A. reported a gross profit of 193.00M and revenue of 573.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.7%.

VNOM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Viper Energy Partners LP reported a gross profit of 255.00M and revenue of 496.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.4%.

PAM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pampa Energía S.A. reported an operating income of 107.00M and revenue of 573.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.7%.

VNOM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Viper Energy Partners LP reported an operating income of 238.00M and revenue of 496.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 48.0%.

PAM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pampa Energía S.A. reported a net income of 214.00M and revenue of 573.00M, resulting in a net margin of 37.4%.

VNOM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Viper Energy Partners LP reported a net income of 97.00M and revenue of 496.00M, resulting in a net margin of 19.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PAM and VNOM have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAM has higher volatility (10.62%) compared to VNOM (7.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAM dropped -87.41% vs VNOM's -86.96%.

VNOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.46 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAM and VNOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer