PAM vs. PPFB.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Pampa Energía S.A. (PAM) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE).
PPFB.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Gold. It was launched on Apr 8, 2011.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PAM or PPFB.DE.
Key characteristics
| PAM | PPFB.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 29.97% | 31.57% |
| 1Y Return | 47.24% | 35.09% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 48.87% | 16.79% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.33 | 2.33 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.15 | 3.17 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.25 | 1.41 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.17 | 5.51 |
| Martin Ratio | 5.84 | 13.41 |
| Ulcer Index | 10.15% | 2.27% |
| Daily Std Dev | 44.57% | 13.13% |
| Max Drawdown | -87.41% | -13.01% |
| Current Drawdown | -10.17% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAM and PPFB.DE is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
PAM vs. PPFB.DE - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, PAM achieves a 29.97% return, which is significantly lower than PPFB.DE's 31.57% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PAM vs. PPFB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pampa Energía S.A. (PAM) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PAM vs. PPFB.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither PAM nor PPFB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
PAM vs. PPFB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAM drawdown since its inception was -87.41%, which is greater than PPFB.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAM and PPFB.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PAM vs. PPFB.DE - Volatility Comparison
Pampa Energía S.A. (PAM) has a higher volatility of 10.04% compared to iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) at 3.27%. This indicates that PAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPFB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.