PALL vs. FXZ

In the year-to-date period, PALL achieves a 2.75% return, which is significantly higher than FXZ's -6.18% return. Over the past 10 years, PALL has underperformed FXZ with an annualized return of 1.33%, while FXZ has yielded a comparatively higher 6.61% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

PALL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FXZ's 0.67% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) and First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current PALL Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is higher than the FXZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PALL and FXZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

PALL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FXZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%.

The maximum PALL drawdown since its inception was -73.63%, which is greater than FXZ's maximum drawdown of -65.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALL and FXZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) is 7.95%, while First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) has a volatility of 16.55%. This indicates that PALL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.