PALDX vs. PRPZX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

PALDX (PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund) and PRPZX (PGIM Jennison MLP Fund) are both mutual funds - PALDX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by PGIM, while PRPZX is a Energy Equities fund managed by PGIM. Over the past 5 years, PALDX returned 9.00%/yr vs 18.40%/yr for PRPZX. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PALDX charges 0.03%/yr vs 1.19%/yr for PRPZX.

Performance

PALDX vs. PRPZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) and PGIM Jennison MLP Fund (PRPZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PALDX achieves a 6.25% return, which is significantly lower than PRPZX's 21.42% return.

PALDX

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: -0.13%
• YTD: 6.25%
• 6M: 5.43%
• 1Y: 17.31%
• 3Y*: 15.93%
• 5Y*: 9.00%
• 10Y*: —

PRPZX

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: -3.73%
• YTD: 21.42%
• 6M: 21.42%
• 1Y: 24.96%
• 3Y*: 24.33%
• 5Y*: 18.40%
• 10Y*: 9.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PALDX vs. PRPZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund	6.25%	13.62%	18.96%	18.90%	-15.65%	16.30%	10.68%	22.27%	-4.12%	5.95%
PRPZX PGIM Jennison MLP Fund	21.42%	7.33%	31.43%	13.07%	20.41%	40.49%	-24.05%	15.32%	-14.17%	0.24%

Correlation

The correlation between PALDX and PRPZX is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2017	0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between PALDX and PRPZX has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

PALDX vs. PRPZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PALDX

PALDX Risk / Return Rank: 72
PALDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
PALDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
PALDX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
PALDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
PALDX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

PRPZX

PRPZX Risk / Return Rank: 58
PRPZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
PRPZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
PRPZX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
PRPZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
PRPZX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PALDX vs. PRPZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) and PGIM Jennison MLP Fund (PRPZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PALDX	PRPZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	1.87	+0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.11	2.61	+0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.32	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	3.96	-0.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.21	9.30	+4.92

PALDX vs. PRPZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PALDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the PRPZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PALDX and PRPZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PALDX vs. PRPZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PALDX drawdown since its inception was -26.16%, smaller than the maximum PRPZX drawdown of -69.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALDX and PRPZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PALDX	PRPZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.16%	-69.62%	+43.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.96%	-6.63%	+0.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.06%	-34.52%	+18.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.47%	-34.52%	+14.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-62.23%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.52%	-6.80%	+5.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.07%	-20.02%	+15.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.29%	2.82%	-1.53%

Volatility

PALDX vs. PRPZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) is 3.35%, while PGIM Jennison MLP Fund (PRPZX) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that PALDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRPZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PALDX	PRPZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.35%	5.29%	-1.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.79%	10.74%	-3.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.40%	14.07%	-5.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.18%	29.04%	-16.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.70%	28.80%	-16.10%

PALDX vs. PRPZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PALDX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than PRPZX's 1.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

PALDX vs. PRPZX - Dividend Comparison

PALDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%, less than PRPZX's 8.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund	5.10%	5.42%	10.40%	2.94%	6.19%	6.87%	2.58%	4.58%	3.65%	1.48%	0.00%	0.00%
PRPZX PGIM Jennison MLP Fund	8.08%	11.68%	52.02%	6.53%	5.72%	5.23%	7.62%	6.95%	7.59%	6.24%	5.57%	6.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PALDX and PRPZX in my portfolio?

PALDX and PRPZX have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PALDX or PRPZX?

PRPZX has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to PALDX (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PALDX dropped -26.16% vs PRPZX's -69.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PALDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.