PALDX vs. FRGAX
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX).
PALDX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Sep 12, 2017. FRGAX is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Jan 1, 2022.
Performance
PALDX vs. FRGAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PALDX vs. FRGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund | -3.62% | 13.62% | 18.96% | 18.90% | -2.38% |
FRGAX Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund | -3.53% | 17.10% | 12.91% | 17.57% | -1.63% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PALDX having a -3.62% return and FRGAX slightly higher at -3.53%.
PALDX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -5.44%
- YTD
- -3.62%
- 6M
- -1.03%
- 1Y
- 12.43%
- 3Y*
- 13.72%
- 5Y*
- 7.99%
- 10Y*
- —
FRGAX
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -6.67%
- YTD
- -3.53%
- 6M
- -1.21%
- 1Y
- 13.49%
- 3Y*
- 12.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PALDX vs. FRGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PALDX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is higher than FRGAX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
PALDX vs. FRGAX — Risk / Return Rank
PALDX
FRGAX
PALDX vs. FRGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PALDX | FRGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.12 | 1.15 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.65 | 1.67 | -0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.25 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 1.41 | +0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.83 | 6.55 | +0.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PALDX | FRGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.12 | 1.15 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 1.21 | -0.50 |
Correlation
The correlation between PALDX and FRGAX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PALDX vs. FRGAX - Dividend Comparison
PALDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.62%, more than FRGAX's 2.08% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund | 5.62% | 5.42% | 10.40% | 2.94% | 6.19% | 6.87% | 2.58% | 4.58% | 3.65% | 1.48% |
FRGAX Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund | 2.08% | 2.00% | 2.01% | 1.77% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PALDX vs. FRGAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PALDX drawdown since its inception was -26.16%, which is greater than FRGAX's maximum drawdown of -11.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALDX and FRGAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PALDX | FRGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.16% | -11.77% | -14.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.20% | -8.53% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.96% | -7.03% | +1.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.16% | -1.62% | -2.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.70% | 1.87% | -0.17% |
Volatility
PALDX vs. FRGAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) is 3.05%, while Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) has a volatility of 3.78%. This indicates that PALDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PALDX | FRGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 3.78% | -0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.86% | 6.72% | -0.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.52% | 11.92% | -0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.08% | 10.27% | +1.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.75% | 10.27% | +2.48% |