PALDX vs. ELDFX
PALDX (PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund) and ELDFX (Elfun Diversified Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, PALDX returned 9.57%/yr vs 7.75%/yr for ELDFX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PALDX charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for ELDFX.
Performance
PALDX vs. ELDFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PALDX having a 7.89% return and ELDFX slightly lower at 7.78%.
PALDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.48%
- YTD
- 7.89%
- 6M
- 8.39%
- 1Y
- 20.92%
- 3Y*
- 17.10%
- 5Y*
- 9.57%
- 10Y*
- —
ELDFX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 3.54%
- YTD
- 7.78%
- 6M
- 8.45%
- 1Y
- 20.04%
- 3Y*
- 14.98%
- 5Y*
- 7.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.82%
PALDX vs. ELDFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund | 7.89% | 13.62% | 18.96% | 18.90% | -15.65% | 16.30% | 10.68% | 22.27% | -4.12% | 5.95% |
ELDFX Elfun Diversified Fund | 7.78% | 17.04% | 11.55% | 16.13% | -15.33% | 11.62% | 12.25% | 19.60% | -5.50% | 4.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between PALDX and ELDFX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2017 | 0.92 |
The correlation between PALDX and ELDFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PALDX vs. ELDFX — Risk / Return Rank
PALDX
ELDFX
PALDX vs. ELDFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) and Elfun Diversified Fund (ELDFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PALDX | ELDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.48 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | 2.92 | +0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.16 | 12.80 | +4.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PALDX | ELDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.73 | 2.50 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.77 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.65 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
PALDX vs. ELDFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PALDX drawdown since its inception was -26.16%, smaller than the maximum ELDFX drawdown of -40.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALDX and ELDFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PALDX | ELDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.16% | -40.54% | +14.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.96% | -6.92% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.06% | -9.57% | -6.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.47% | -21.52% | +1.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.09% | -4.65% | +0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.25% | 1.58% | -0.33% |
Volatility
PALDX vs. ELDFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) is 2.30%, while Elfun Diversified Fund (ELDFX) has a volatility of 2.46%. This indicates that PALDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ELDFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PALDX | ELDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.30% | 2.46% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.18% | 6.53% | -0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.89% | 8.10% | -0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.11% | 10.06% | +2.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.69% | 10.16% | +2.53% |
PALDX vs. ELDFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PALDX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than ELDFX's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
PALDX vs. ELDFX - Dividend Comparison
PALDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, less than ELDFX's 7.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELDFX Elfun Diversified Fund | 7.20% | 7.77% | 6.38% | 2.56% | 7.89% | 7.91% | 4.54% | 4.17% | 3.24% | 11.08% | 3.06% | 6.01% |
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund | 5.02% | 5.42% | 10.40% | 2.94% | 6.19% | 6.87% | 2.58% | 4.58% | 3.65% | 1.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, PALDX and ELDFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ELDFX has higher volatility (2.46%) compared to PALDX (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PALDX dropped -26.16% vs ELDFX's -40.54%.
PALDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PALDX and ELDFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer