PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PALDX vs. BWBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PALDX vs. BWBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) and Baron WealthBuilder Fund (BWBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PALDX achieves a 7.89% return, which is significantly higher than BWBIX's 0.74% return.


PALDX

1D
0.00%
1M
3.48%
YTD
7.89%
6M
8.39%
1Y
20.92%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
9.57%
10Y*

BWBIX

1D
-1.04%
1M
4.14%
YTD
0.74%
6M
5.76%
1Y
11.63%
3Y*
13.94%
5Y*
4.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PALDX vs. BWBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PALDX
PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund
7.89%13.62%18.96%18.90%-15.65%16.30%10.68%22.27%-4.94%
BWBIX
Baron WealthBuilder Fund
0.74%10.23%19.62%25.77%-32.58%14.76%62.85%36.41%-12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between PALDX and BWBIX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2018

0.84

The correlation between PALDX and BWBIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PALDX vs. BWBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PALDX
PALDX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PALDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PALDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
PALDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
PALDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PALDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

BWBIX
BWBIX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
BWBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
BWBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PALDX vs. BWBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) and Baron WealthBuilder Fund (BWBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PALDXBWBIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.16

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

1.05

+2.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.16

3.47

+13.69

PALDX vs. BWBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PALDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the BWBIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PALDX and BWBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PALDXBWBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

0.85

+1.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.22

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.53

+0.28

Drawdowns

PALDX vs. BWBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PALDX drawdown since its inception was -26.16%, smaller than the maximum BWBIX drawdown of -39.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALDX and BWBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PALDXBWBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.16%

-39.14%

+12.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.96%

-11.65%

+5.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.06%

-21.59%

+5.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.47%

-39.14%

+18.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.26%

+1.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.09%

-11.72%

+7.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

3.53%

-2.28%

Volatility

PALDX vs. BWBIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) is 2.30%, while Baron WealthBuilder Fund (BWBIX) has a volatility of 3.38%. This indicates that PALDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PALDXBWBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.30%

3.38%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.18%

10.99%

-4.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.89%

14.36%

-6.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.11%

21.08%

-8.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.69%

23.14%

-10.45%

PALDX vs. BWBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PALDX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than BWBIX's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PALDX vs. BWBIX - Dividend Comparison

PALDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, less than BWBIX's 7.55% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BWBIX
Baron WealthBuilder Fund
7.55%7.61%0.77%0.06%3.21%3.75%1.24%3.51%0.14%0.00%
PALDX
PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund
5.02%5.42%10.40%2.94%6.19%6.87%2.58%4.58%3.65%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


PALDX and BWBIX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BWBIX has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to PALDX (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PALDX dropped -26.16% vs BWBIX's -39.14%.

PALDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PALDX and BWBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer