PAGP vs. NGL
PAGP (Plains GP Holdings, L.P.) and NGL (NGL Energy Partners LP) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — PAGP in Oil & Gas Midstream, NGL in Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing. Over the past 10 years, PAGP returned 5.68%/yr vs 5.06%/yr for NGL. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PAGP vs. NGL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAGP achieves a 29.26% return, which is significantly lower than NGL's 64.60% return. Over the past 10 years, PAGP has outperformed NGL with an annualized return of 5.68%, while NGL has yielded a comparatively lower 5.06% annualized return.
PAGP
- 1D
- 2.06%
- 1M
- -8.17%
- YTD
- 29.26%
- 6M
- 30.76%
- 1Y
- 32.67%
- 3Y*
- 29.09%
- 5Y*
- 23.42%
- 10Y*
- 5.68%
NGL
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -9.11%
- YTD
- 64.60%
- 6M
- 62.65%
- 1Y
- 257.05%
- 3Y*
- 63.30%
- 5Y*
- 47.35%
- 10Y*
- 5.06%
PAGP vs. NGL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAGP Plains GP Holdings, L.P. | 29.26% | 12.69% | 23.64% | 38.09% | 31.78% | 28.97% | -51.17% | 0.30% | -3.49% | -32.11% |
NGL NGL Energy Partners LP | 64.60% | 100.40% | -10.41% | 360.33% | -33.52% | -24.17% | -75.27% | 34.05% | -22.35% | -20.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAGP and NGL is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2013 | 0.41 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PAGP and NGL has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
PAGP:
$2.23
NGL:
$1.24
PAGP:
10.67
NGL:
13.26
PAGP:
0.14
NGL:
0.12
PAGP:
0.17
NGL:
0.66
PAGP:
$45.26B
NGL:
$3.18B
PAGP:
$2.07B
NGL:
$755.25M
PAGP:
$2.44B
NGL:
$639.38M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAGP vs. NGL — Risk / Return Rank
PAGP
NGL
PAGP vs. NGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Plains GP Holdings, L.P. (PAGP) and NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PAGP | NGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.68 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 16.22 | -13.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.35 | 41.98 | -35.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PAGP vs. NGL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAGP drawdown since its inception was -94.21%, roughly equal to the maximum NGL drawdown of -94.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAGP and NGL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAGP | NGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.21% | -94.71% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.44% | -15.96% | +1.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.02% | -53.72% | +32.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.28% | -63.12% | +40.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.04% | -92.74% | +4.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.48% | -16.20% | -20.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.64% | -51.71% | -5.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.16% | 6.58% | -1.42% |
Volatility
PAGP vs. NGL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Plains GP Holdings, L.P. (PAGP) is 5.86%, while NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL) has a volatility of 14.14%. This indicates that PAGP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAGP | NGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.86% | 14.14% | -8.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.52% | 34.11% | -20.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.79% | 53.05% | -35.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.13% | 58.25% | -31.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.67% | 69.58% | -27.91% |
Dividends
PAGP vs. NGL - Dividend Comparison
PAGP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.69%, while NGL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NGL NGL Energy Partners LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 37.08% | 13.76% | 16.27% | 16.23% | 8.62% | 22.78% |
PAGP Plains GP Holdings, L.P. | 6.69% | 7.94% | 6.91% | 6.71% | 6.69% | 7.10% | 10.65% | 7.28% | 5.97% | 8.88% | 6.91% | 9.34% |
Financials
PAGP vs. NGL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Plains GP Holdings, L.P. and NGL Energy Partners LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PAGP vs. NGL - Profitability Comparison
PAGP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Plains GP Holdings, L.P. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 12.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
NGL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NGL Energy Partners LP reported a gross profit of 194.75M and revenue of 909.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.4%.
PAGP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Plains GP Holdings, L.P. reported an operating income of 405.00M and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.3%.
NGL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NGL Energy Partners LP reported an operating income of 109.14M and revenue of 909.82M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.0%.
PAGP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Plains GP Holdings, L.P. reported a net income of 551.00M and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.
NGL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NGL Energy Partners LP reported a net income of 47.18M and revenue of 909.82M, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PAGP and NGL have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NGL has higher volatility (14.14%) compared to PAGP (5.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAGP dropped -94.21% vs NGL's -94.71%.
NGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.88 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAGP and NGL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer