NGL vs. IAG

In the year-to-date period, NGL achieves a -32.26% return, which is significantly lower than IAG's 29.07% return. Over the past 10 years, NGL has underperformed IAG with an annualized return of -13.32%, while IAG has yielded a comparatively higher 12.02% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL) and IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current NGL Sharpe Ratio is -0.74, which is lower than the IAG Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NGL and IAG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither NGL nor IAG has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum NGL drawdown since its inception was -94.73%, roughly equal to the maximum IAG drawdown of -95.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NGL and IAG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL) has a higher volatility of 20.71% compared to IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) at 17.41%. This indicates that NGL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NGL Energy Partners LP and IAMGOLD Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.