PAGP vs. XOM

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Plains GP Holdings, L.P. (PAGP) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM).

Performance

PAGP vs. XOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Plains GP Holdings, L.P. (PAGP) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PAGP vs. XOM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PAGP Plains GP Holdings, L.P.	26.46%	12.69%	23.64%	38.09%	31.78%	28.97%	-51.17%	0.30%	-3.49%	-32.11%
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation	34.50%	15.98%	11.26%	-6.26%	87.41%	57.58%	-36.21%	7.23%	-15.09%	-3.81%

Fundamentals

EPS PAGP : $1.47 XOM : $10.37
PE Ratio PAGP : 16.17 XOM : 15.50
PEG Ratio PAGP : 0.15 XOM : 0.38
PS Ratio PAGP : 0.20 XOM : 1.42
Total Revenue (TTM) PAGP : $44.26B XOM : $327.29B
Gross Profit (TTM) PAGP : $2.34B XOM : $81.32B
EBITDA (TTM) PAGP : $2.70B XOM : $61.89B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAGP achieves a 26.46% return, which is significantly lower than XOM's 34.50% return. Over the past 10 years, PAGP has underperformed XOM with an annualized return of 8.26%, while XOM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.60% annualized return.

PAGP

• 1D: -2.31%
• 1M: 3.27%
• YTD: 26.46%
• 6M: 35.17%
• 1Y: 19.91%
• 3Y*: 31.26%
• 5Y*: 29.25%
• 10Y*: 8.26%

XOM

• 1D: -5.23%
• 1M: 4.25%
• YTD: 34.50%
• 6M: 45.79%
• 1Y: 39.70%
• 3Y*: 17.54%
• 5Y*: 27.68%
• 10Y*: 11.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PAGP vs. XOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAGP

PAGP Risk / Return Rank: 63
PAGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
PAGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
PAGP Omega Ratio Rank: 62
PAGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
PAGP Martin Ratio Rank: 60

XOM

XOM Risk / Return Rank: 81
XOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
XOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
XOM Omega Ratio Rank: 78
XOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
XOM Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAGP vs. XOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Plains GP Holdings, L.P. (PAGP) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PAGP	XOM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.84	1.57	-0.73
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.21	2.04	-0.83
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.27	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.02	2.48	-1.46
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.02	6.44	-4.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PAGP vs. XOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAGP Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the XOM Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAGP and XOM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PAGP	XOM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84	1.57	-0.73
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.06	1.05	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.20	0.42	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.02	0.48	-0.50

Correlation

The correlation between PAGP and XOM is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

PAGP vs. XOM - Dividend Comparison

PAGP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.57%, more than XOM's 2.51% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PAGP Plains GP Holdings, L.P.	6.57%	7.94%	6.91%	6.71%	6.69%	7.10%	10.65%	7.28%	5.97%	8.88%	6.91%	9.34%
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation	2.51%	3.32%	3.57%	3.68%	3.22%	5.70%	8.44%	4.92%	4.74%	3.66%	3.30%	3.69%

Drawdowns

PAGP vs. XOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAGP drawdown since its inception was -94.21%, which is greater than XOM's maximum drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAGP and XOM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAGP	XOM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.21%	-62.40%	-31.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.18%	-15.79%	-4.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.89%	-20.51%	-3.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-88.04%	-61.34%	-26.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.85%	-6.23%	-31.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.03%	-10.20%	-47.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.17%	6.18%	+3.99%

Volatility

PAGP vs. XOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Plains GP Holdings, L.P. (PAGP) is 6.16%, while Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) has a volatility of 8.47%. This indicates that PAGP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAGP	XOM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.16%	8.47%	-2.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.73%	17.04%	-5.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.81%	25.43%	-1.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.72%	26.57%	+1.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.30%	27.93%	+14.37%

Financials

PAGP vs. XOM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Plains GP Holdings, L.P. and Exxon Mobil Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

PAGP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Plains GP Holdings, L.P. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 10.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

XOM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a gross profit of 26.20B and revenue of 83.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.4%.

PAGP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Plains GP Holdings, L.P. reported an operating income of 182.00M and revenue of 10.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.8%.

XOM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported an operating income of 9.81B and revenue of 83.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.

PAGP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Plains GP Holdings, L.P. reported a net income of 342.00M and revenue of 10.03B, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.

XOM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a net income of 7.61B and revenue of 83.43B, resulting in a net margin of 9.1%.