PAGP vs. XOM
PAGP (Plains GP Holdings, L.P.) and XOM (Exxon Mobil Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — PAGP in Oil & Gas Midstream, XOM in Oil & Gas Integrated. Over the past 10 years, PAGP returned 5.47%/yr vs 9.11%/yr for XOM. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
PAGP vs. XOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAGP achieves a 26.65% return, which is significantly higher than XOM's 16.62% return. Over the past 10 years, PAGP has underperformed XOM with an annualized return of 5.47%, while XOM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.11% annualized return.
PAGP
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -10.02%
- YTD
- 26.65%
- 6M
- 29.15%
- 1Y
- 28.47%
- 3Y*
- 28.22%
- 5Y*
- 22.84%
- 10Y*
- 5.47%
XOM
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -10.62%
- YTD
- 16.62%
- 6M
- 18.78%
- 1Y
- 24.57%
- 3Y*
- 14.34%
- 5Y*
- 20.96%
- 10Y*
- 9.11%
PAGP vs. XOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAGP Plains GP Holdings, L.P. | 26.65% | 12.69% | 23.64% | 38.09% | 31.78% | 28.97% | -51.17% | 0.30% | -3.49% | -32.11% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 16.62% | 15.98% | 11.26% | -6.26% | 87.41% | 57.58% | -36.21% | 7.23% | -15.09% | -3.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAGP and XOM is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2013 | 0.51 |
The correlation between PAGP and XOM shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (3 years) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PAGP:
$16.49B
XOM:
$579.22B
PAGP:
$2.23
XOM:
$5.93
PAGP:
10.45
XOM:
23.36
PAGP:
0.14
XOM:
1.08
PAGP:
0.17
XOM:
1.81
PAGP:
1.29
XOM:
2.28
PAGP:
$45.26B
XOM:
$326.01B
PAGP:
$2.07B
XOM:
$83.11B
PAGP:
$2.44B
XOM:
$60.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAGP vs. XOM — Risk / Return Rank
PAGP
XOM
PAGP vs. XOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Plains GP Holdings, L.P. (PAGP) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PAGP | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.18 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 1.29 | +0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.56 | 3.90 | +1.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PAGP vs. XOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAGP drawdown since its inception was -94.21%, which is greater than XOM's maximum drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAGP and XOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAGP | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.21% | -62.40% | -31.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.44% | -19.08% | +4.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.02% | -19.08% | -1.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.28% | -20.51% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.04% | -61.34% | -26.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.76% | -18.70% | -19.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.64% | -10.21% | -47.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.14% | 6.36% | -1.22% |
Volatility
PAGP vs. XOM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Plains GP Holdings, L.P. (PAGP) is 5.67%, while Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) has a volatility of 7.89%. This indicates that PAGP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAGP | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.67% | 7.89% | -2.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.43% | 20.78% | -7.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.72% | 24.89% | -7.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.12% | 26.70% | +0.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.69% | 28.25% | +13.44% |
Dividends
PAGP vs. XOM - Dividend Comparison
PAGP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%, more than XOM's 2.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAGP Plains GP Holdings, L.P. | 6.83% | 7.94% | 6.91% | 6.71% | 6.69% | 7.10% | 10.65% | 7.28% | 5.97% | 8.88% | 6.91% | 9.34% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 2.95% | 3.32% | 3.57% | 3.68% | 3.22% | 5.70% | 8.44% | 4.92% | 4.74% | 3.66% | 3.30% | 3.69% |
Financials
PAGP vs. XOM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Plains GP Holdings, L.P. and Exxon Mobil Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PAGP vs. XOM - Profitability Comparison
PAGP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Plains GP Holdings, L.P. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 12.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
XOM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a gross profit of 31.36B and revenue of 83.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.
PAGP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Plains GP Holdings, L.P. reported an operating income of 405.00M and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.3%.
XOM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported an operating income of 5.29B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.
PAGP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Plains GP Holdings, L.P. reported a net income of 551.00M and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.
XOM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a net income of 4.18B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in a net margin of 5.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PAGP and XOM have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOM has higher volatility (7.89%) compared to PAGP (5.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAGP dropped -94.21% vs XOM's -62.40%.
PAGP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAGP and XOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer