NGL vs. KRE

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NGL (NGL Energy Partners LP) is a stock, while KRE (SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF) is Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P Regional Banks Select Industry Index. Over the past 10 years, NGL returned 5.06%/yr vs 9.59%/yr for KRE. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NGL vs. KRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL) and SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NGL achieves a 64.60% return, which is significantly higher than KRE's 14.14% return. Over the past 10 years, NGL has underperformed KRE with an annualized return of 5.06%, while KRE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.59% annualized return.

NGL

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: -9.11%
• YTD: 64.60%
• 6M: 62.65%
• 1Y: 257.05%
• 3Y*: 63.30%
• 5Y*: 47.35%
• 10Y*: 5.06%

KRE

• 1D: 1.57%
• 1M: 6.02%
• YTD: 14.14%
• 6M: 10.96%
• 1Y: 29.42%
• 3Y*: 26.19%
• 5Y*: 4.63%
• 10Y*: 9.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NGL vs. KRE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NGL NGL Energy Partners LP	64.60%	100.40%	-10.41%	360.33%	-33.52%	-24.17%	-75.27%	34.05%	-22.35%	-20.22%
KRE SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF	14.14%	10.21%	18.58%	-7.61%	-15.08%	39.29%	-7.43%	27.44%	-18.81%	7.49%

Correlation

The correlation between NGL and KRE is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2011	0.22

The correlation between NGL and KRE shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (3 years) to 0.24 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NGL vs. KRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NGL

NGL Risk / Return Rank: 98
NGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
NGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
NGL Omega Ratio Rank: 97
NGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
NGL Martin Ratio Rank: 99

KRE

KRE Risk / Return Rank: 37
KRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
KRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
KRE Omega Ratio Rank: 38
KRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
KRE Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NGL vs. KRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL) and SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NGL	KRE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.88	1.27	+3.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.38	1.81	+3.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.68	1.24	+0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	16.22	1.98	+14.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	41.98	5.13	+36.85

NGL vs. KRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NGL Sharpe Ratio is 4.88, which is higher than the KRE Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NGL and KRE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NGL vs. KRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NGL drawdown since its inception was -94.71%, which is greater than KRE's maximum drawdown of -68.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NGL and KRE.

Drawdown Indicators

	NGL	KRE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.71%	-68.54%	-26.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.96%	-14.95%	-1.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-53.72%	-28.20%	-25.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.12%	-52.69%	-10.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-92.74%	-54.92%	-37.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.20%	0.00%	-16.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.71%	-21.85%	-29.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.58%	5.75%	+0.83%

Volatility

NGL vs. KRE - Volatility Comparison

NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL) has a higher volatility of 14.14% compared to SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE) at 6.34%. This indicates that NGL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NGL	KRE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.14%	6.34%	+7.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.11%	16.05%	+18.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.05%	23.33%	+29.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	58.25%	29.85%	+28.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	69.58%	31.85%	+37.73%

Dividends

NGL vs. KRE - Dividend Comparison

NGL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KRE SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF	2.19%	2.45%	2.59%	2.99%	2.51%	1.97%	2.78%	2.21%	2.48%	1.40%	1.40%	1.80%
NGL NGL Energy Partners LP	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	37.08%	13.76%	16.27%	16.23%	8.62%	22.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NGL and KRE in my portfolio?

NGL and KRE have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NGL or KRE?

NGL has higher volatility (14.14%) compared to KRE (6.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NGL dropped -94.71% vs KRE's -68.54%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.88 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.