PAGLX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock Fund (PAGLX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
PAGLX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Oct 26, 2008. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
PAGLX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PAGLX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAGLX T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock Fund | -6.68% | 14.37% | 18.57% | 18.99% | -29.87% | 10.73% | 43.90% | 30.55% | -7.22% | 34.08% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.53% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAGLX achieves a -6.68% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 9.53% return. Over the past 10 years, PAGLX has outperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 10.87%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
PAGLX
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -9.33%
- YTD
- -6.68%
- 6M
- -4.81%
- 1Y
- 10.32%
- 3Y*
- 12.22%
- 5Y*
- 2.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.87%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PAGLX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAGLX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PAGLX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
PAGLX
FGIAX
PAGLX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock Fund (PAGLX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAGLX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.60 | 1.75 | -1.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.94 | 2.26 | -1.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.35 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | 2.61 | -1.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.92 | 12.12 | -9.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAGLX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 | 1.75 | -1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.80 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.58 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.42 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between PAGLX and FGIAX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PAGLX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
PAGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.40%, more than FGIAX's 9.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAGLX T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock Fund | 12.40% | 11.57% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.07% | 8.74% | 3.13% | 0.20% | 1.38% | 0.75% | 0.21% | 4.82% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.12% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
PAGLX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAGLX drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, smaller than the maximum FGIAX drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAGLX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAGLX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.76% | -49.35% | +9.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.63% | -8.29% | -3.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.76% | -21.08% | -18.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.76% | -38.02% | -1.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.51% | -3.78% | -6.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.78% | -7.22% | -0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.87% | 1.78% | +1.09% |
Volatility
PAGLX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock Fund (PAGLX) has a higher volatility of 5.65% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.05%. This indicates that PAGLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PAGLX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.65% | 4.05% | +1.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.90% | 7.09% | +3.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.21% | 12.28% | +4.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 13.08% | +4.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 15.17% | +2.82% |