PAC vs. KEN
PAC (Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.) and KEN (Kenon Holdings Ltd.) are both stocks. PAC operates in Airports & Air Services (Industrials), while KEN operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, PAC returned 14.31%/yr vs 41.88%/yr for KEN. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PAC vs. KEN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAC achieves a -10.14% return, which is significantly lower than KEN's 14.26% return. Over the past 10 years, PAC has underperformed KEN with an annualized return of 14.31%, while KEN has yielded a comparatively higher 41.88% annualized return.
PAC
- 1D
- 3.08%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- YTD
- -10.14%
- 6M
- -8.95%
- 1Y
- 4.13%
- 3Y*
- 12.84%
- 5Y*
- 20.66%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
KEN
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -17.72%
- YTD
- 14.26%
- 6M
- 23.62%
- 1Y
- 118.60%
- 3Y*
- 57.99%
- 5Y*
- 31.84%
- 10Y*
- 41.88%
PAC vs. KEN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAC Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. | -10.14% | 56.30% | 4.19% | 28.64% | 9.79% | 29.95% | -6.17% | 54.36% | -15.66% | 32.15% |
KEN Kenon Holdings Ltd. | 14.26% | 126.18% | 62.44% | -19.16% | -23.73% | 93.65% | 57.17% | 50.73% | 23.06% | 85.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAC and KEN is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2015 | 0.20 |
The correlation between PAC and KEN shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.27 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PAC:
$11.97B
KEN:
$3.84B
PAC:
MX$214.01
KEN:
$1.54
PAC:
19.09
KEN:
46.98
PAC:
1.16
KEN:
7.89
PAC:
6.29
KEN:
3.80
PAC:
8.03
KEN:
2.56
PAC:
MX$32.84B
KEN:
$1.01B
PAC:
MX$10.93B
KEN:
$166.82M
PAC:
MX$20.54B
KEN:
$339.95M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAC vs. KEN — Risk / Return Rank
PAC
KEN
PAC vs. KEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. (PAC) and Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PAC | KEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.44 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 4.42 | -4.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.27 | 17.27 | -17.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PAC vs. KEN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAC drawdown since its inception was -73.20%, which is greater than KEN's maximum drawdown of -69.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAC and KEN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAC | KEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.20% | -69.20% | -4.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.19% | -26.41% | +0.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.83% | -32.27% | -10.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.83% | -69.20% | +26.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.65% | -69.20% | +2.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.14% | -24.16% | +3.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.52% | -23.19% | +6.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.29% | 6.74% | +5.55% |
Volatility
PAC vs. KEN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. (PAC) is 10.37%, while Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) has a volatility of 14.84%. This indicates that PAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAC | KEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.37% | 14.84% | -4.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.96% | 30.71% | -4.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.04% | 39.55% | -8.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.11% | 39.79% | -3.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.51% | 41.93% | -3.42% |
Dividends
PAC vs. KEN - Dividend Comparison
PAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than KEN's 5.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEN Kenon Holdings Ltd. | 5.31% | 7.24% | 11.18% | 11.46% | 25.00% | 7.35% | 7.41% | 5.75% | 96.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 45.52% |
PAC Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. | 1.89% | 3.33% | 4.14% | 4.88% | 5.02% | 4.17% | 0.00% | 4.99% | 6.27% | 5.83% | 4.50% | 3.98% |
Financials
PAC vs. KEN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. and Kenon Holdings Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PAC vs. KEN - Profitability Comparison
PAC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. reported a gross profit of 6.29B and revenue of 11.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.3%.
KEN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported a gross profit of 47.00M and revenue of 317.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.8%.
PAC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. reported an operating income of 5.04B and revenue of 11.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 44.4%.
KEN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported an operating income of 4.00M and revenue of 317.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.
PAC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. reported a net income of 3.31B and revenue of 11.37B, resulting in a net margin of 29.1%.
KEN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported a net income of 26.00M and revenue of 317.00M, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PAC and KEN have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KEN has higher volatility (14.84%) compared to PAC (10.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAC dropped -73.20% vs KEN's -69.20%.
KEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAC and KEN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer