P vs. RING

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

P (Everpure, Inc.) is a stock, while RING (iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF) is Gold fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index. Over the past 10 years, P returned 21.03%/yr vs 13.85%/yr for RING. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

P vs. RING - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Everpure, Inc. (P) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, P achieves a 7.91% return, which is significantly higher than RING's -5.54% return. Over the past 10 years, P has outperformed RING with an annualized return of 21.03%, while RING has yielded a comparatively lower 13.85% annualized return.

P

• 1D: 4.28%
• 1M: -14.36%
• YTD: 7.91%
• 6M: 1.39%
• 1Y: 32.70%
• 3Y*: 25.48%
• 5Y*: 30.55%
• 10Y*: 21.03%

RING

• 1D: 3.20%
• 1M: -16.79%
• YTD: -5.54%
• 6M: -4.18%
• 1Y: 56.55%
• 3Y*: 44.87%
• 5Y*: 18.76%
• 10Y*: 13.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

P vs. RING - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
P Everpure, Inc.	7.91%	9.08%	72.27%	33.26%	-17.79%	43.96%	32.14%	6.41%	1.39%	40.23%
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF	-5.54%	164.72%	15.98%	12.29%	-15.40%	-7.46%	24.98%	49.92%	-13.14%	10.24%

Correlation

The correlation between P and RING is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2015	0.10

The correlation between P and RING shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

P vs. RING — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

P

P Risk / Return Rank: 60
P Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
P Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
P Omega Ratio Rank: 62
P Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
P Martin Ratio Rank: 58

RING

RING Risk / Return Rank: 36
RING Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
RING Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
RING Omega Ratio Rank: 39
RING Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
RING Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

P vs. RING - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Everpure, Inc. (P) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	P	RING	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.48	1.20	-0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.12	1.62	-0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.23	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.78	1.59	-0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.50	4.45	-2.95

P vs. RING - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current P Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the RING Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of P and RING, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

P vs. RING - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum P drawdown since its inception was -69.43%, smaller than the maximum RING drawdown of -79.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for P and RING.

Drawdown Indicators

	P	RING	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.43%	-79.47%	+10.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.26%	-35.72%	-6.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.63%	-35.72%	-12.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.63%	-47.94%	-0.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-69.43%	-52.04%	-17.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.74%	-30.03%	+3.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.44%	-47.36%	+22.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.89%	12.74%	+9.15%

Volatility

P vs. RING - Volatility Comparison

Everpure, Inc. (P) has a higher volatility of 26.95% compared to iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) at 16.83%. This indicates that P's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RING based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	P	RING	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.95%	16.83%	+10.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.02%	39.11%	+5.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.32%	47.31%	+21.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.74%	36.81%	+15.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.15%	36.70%	+14.45%

Dividends

P vs. RING - Dividend Comparison

P has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RING's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
P Everpure, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF	0.89%	0.84%	1.43%	2.01%	2.29%	2.38%	0.83%	0.83%	0.70%	0.42%	1.41%	0.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both P and RING in my portfolio?

P and RING have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, P or RING?

P has higher volatility (26.95%) compared to RING (16.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, P dropped -69.43% vs RING's -79.47%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RING currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.