OWNS vs. BUCK

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

OWNS (CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF) and BUCK (Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OWNS is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by CCM, while BUCK is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, OWNS returned 6.23% vs 7.46% for BUCK. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OWNS charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BUCK.

Performance

OWNS vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF (OWNS) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OWNS achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly lower than BUCK's 1.99% return.

OWNS

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.12%
• YTD: 0.36%
• 6M: 0.78%
• 1Y: 6.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BUCK

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.43%
• YTD: 1.99%
• 6M: 1.92%
• 1Y: 7.46%
• 3Y*: 5.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OWNS vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
OWNS CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF	0.36%	7.75%	3.84%
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF	1.99%	4.13%	4.48%

Correlation

The correlation between OWNS and BUCK is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2024	0.25

Return for Risk

OWNS vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OWNS

OWNS Risk / Return Rank: 40
OWNS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
OWNS Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
OWNS Omega Ratio Rank: 41
OWNS Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
OWNS Martin Ratio Rank: 38

BUCK

BUCK Risk / Return Rank: 85
BUCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
BUCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
BUCK Omega Ratio Rank: 85
BUCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
BUCK Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OWNS vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF (OWNS) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OWNS	BUCK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.39	2.42	-1.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	3.60	-1.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.51	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.06	5.73	-3.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.99	30.33	-24.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OWNS vs. BUCK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OWNS Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the BUCK Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OWNS and BUCK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OWNS	BUCK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.39	2.42	-1.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.00	1.48	-0.47

Drawdowns

OWNS vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OWNS drawdown since its inception was -5.39%, roughly equal to the maximum BUCK drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OWNS and BUCK.

Drawdown Indicators

	OWNS	BUCK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.39%	-5.43%	+0.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.03%	-1.31%	-1.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-5.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.67%	0.00%	-1.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.55%	-0.49%	-1.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.04%	0.25%	+0.79%

Volatility

OWNS vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison

CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF (OWNS) has a higher volatility of 1.46% compared to Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) at 0.70%. This indicates that OWNS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OWNS	BUCK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.46%	0.70%	+0.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.06%	1.52%	+1.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.55%	3.14%	+1.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.39%	3.48%	+1.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.39%	3.48%	+1.91%

OWNS vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison

OWNS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

OWNS vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison

OWNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, less than BUCK's 7.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF	7.41%	7.59%	8.84%	4.84%	0.59%
OWNS CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF	4.31%	4.12%	3.75%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OWNS and BUCK in my portfolio?

OWNS and BUCK have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OWNS or BUCK?

OWNS has higher volatility (1.46%) compared to BUCK (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OWNS dropped -5.39% vs BUCK's -5.43%.

Which ETF is better, OWNS or BUCK?

On 1-year performance, BUCK leads with 7.46% vs 6.23% for OWNS. On fees, OWNS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, BUCK has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OWNS or BUCK?

Over the 1-year period, BUCK has performed better with a 7.46% return vs 6.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OWNS or BUCK?

OWNS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BUCK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OWNS or BUCK?

BUCK has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 4.31% for OWNS.

What is the main difference between OWNS and BUCK?

OWNS is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while BUCK is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: CCM and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for OWNS and 0.35% for BUCK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BUCK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.