PortfoliosLab logo
OWNS vs. MBB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between OWNS and MBB is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

OWNS vs. MBB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF (OWNS) and iShares MBS Bond ETF (MBB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

OWNS:

1.05

MBB:

1.08

Sortino Ratio

OWNS:

1.58

MBB:

1.60

Omega Ratio

OWNS:

1.19

MBB:

1.19

Calmar Ratio

OWNS:

0.53

MBB:

0.56

Martin Ratio

OWNS:

2.53

MBB:

2.84

Ulcer Index

OWNS:

2.35%

MBB:

2.28%

Daily Std Dev

OWNS:

5.51%

MBB:

5.94%

Max Drawdown

OWNS:

-17.05%

MBB:

-17.64%

Current Drawdown

OWNS:

-5.51%

MBB:

-5.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OWNS achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly lower than MBB's 2.50% return.


OWNS

YTD

1.59%

1M

-0.90%

6M

0.12%

1Y

5.81%

3Y*

0.95%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

MBB

YTD

2.50%

1M

-0.52%

6M

0.69%

1Y

6.01%

3Y*

1.21%

5Y*

-0.97%

10Y*

0.99%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF

iShares MBS Bond ETF

OWNS vs. MBB - Expense Ratio Comparison

OWNS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MBB's 0.06% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OWNS vs. MBB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OWNS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of OWNS is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of OWNS is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of OWNS is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of OWNS is 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of OWNS is 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of OWNS is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

MBB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MBB is 7272
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MBB is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MBB is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MBB is 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MBB is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MBB is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

OWNS vs. MBB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF (OWNS) and iShares MBS Bond ETF (MBB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current OWNS Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the MBB Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OWNS and MBB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

OWNS vs. MBB - Dividend Comparison

OWNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, less than MBB's 4.07% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
OWNS
CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF
3.68%3.75%3.01%2.49%0.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MBB
iShares MBS Bond ETF
4.07%3.94%3.40%2.31%1.05%2.10%2.77%2.64%2.23%2.58%2.66%1.72%

Drawdowns

OWNS vs. MBB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OWNS drawdown since its inception was -17.05%, roughly equal to the maximum MBB drawdown of -17.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OWNS and MBB.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

OWNS vs. MBB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF (OWNS) is 1.56%, while iShares MBS Bond ETF (MBB) has a volatility of 1.93%. This indicates that OWNS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MBB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...