PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OWNS vs. DCRE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OWNS vs. DCRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF (OWNS) and DoubleLine Commercial Real Estate ETF (DCRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OWNS achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than DCRE's 1.41% return.


OWNS

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.03%
YTD
0.48%
6M
0.73%
1Y
6.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DCRE

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.13%
YTD
1.41%
6M
1.55%
1Y
4.83%
3Y*
6.21%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OWNS vs. DCRE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
OWNS
CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF
0.48%7.75%3.84%
DCRE
DoubleLine Commercial Real Estate ETF
1.41%5.86%5.78%

Correlation

The correlation between OWNS and DCRE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2024

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OWNS vs. DCRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OWNS
OWNS Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
OWNS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OWNS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
OWNS Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
OWNS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
OWNS Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

DCRE
DCRE Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
DCRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCRE Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
DCRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCRE Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OWNS vs. DCRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF (OWNS) and DoubleLine Commercial Real Estate ETF (DCRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OWNSDCREDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.48

4.24

-2.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.20

7.31

-5.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.98

-0.70

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

7.09

-4.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.36

26.29

-19.94

OWNS vs. DCRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OWNS Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the DCRE Sharpe Ratio of 4.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OWNS and DCRE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OWNSDCREDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

4.24

-2.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.02

3.91

-2.89

Drawdowns

OWNS vs. DCRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OWNS drawdown since its inception was -5.39%, which is greater than DCRE's maximum drawdown of -0.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OWNS and DCRE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OWNSDCREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.39%

-0.84%

-4.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.03%

-0.68%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.55%

-0.18%

-1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.55%

-0.11%

-1.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

0.18%

+0.85%

Volatility

OWNS vs. DCRE - Volatility Comparison

CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF (OWNS) has a higher volatility of 1.49% compared to DoubleLine Commercial Real Estate ETF (DCRE) at 0.47%. This indicates that OWNS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DCRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OWNSDCREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.49%

0.47%

+1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.08%

0.88%

+2.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.56%

1.14%

+3.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.40%

1.58%

+3.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.40%

1.58%

+3.82%

OWNS vs. DCRE - Expense Ratio Comparison

OWNS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than DCRE's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

OWNS vs. DCRE - Dividend Comparison

OWNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, less than DCRE's 4.75% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
DCRE
DoubleLine Commercial Real Estate ETF
4.75%4.84%5.52%3.47%
OWNS
CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF
4.31%4.12%3.75%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OWNS and DCRE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OWNS has higher volatility (1.49%) compared to DCRE (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OWNS dropped -5.39% vs DCRE's -0.84%.

On 1-year performance, OWNS leads with 6.72% vs 4.83% for DCRE. On fees, OWNS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, DCRE has been the lower-risk option at 0.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, OWNS has performed better with a 6.72% return vs 4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OWNS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DCRE.

DCRE has the higher dividend yield at 4.75%, compared with 4.31% for OWNS.

OWNS is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while DCRE is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: CCM and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for OWNS and 0.40% for DCRE.

DCRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.24 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OWNS and DCRE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer