PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OWL vs. RNST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OWL vs. RNST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) and Renasant Corporation (RNST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OWL achieves a -28.04% return, which is significantly lower than RNST's 25.22% return.


OWL

1D
1.38%
1M
13.94%
6M
-21.18%
YTD
-28.04%
1Y
-41.43%
3Y*
-0.97%
5Y*
-2.16%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.12%

RNST

1D
0.53%
1M
1.37%
6M
16.96%
YTD
25.22%
1Y
25.66%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
7.19%
10Y*
5.84%
ALL TIME*
9.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$179.46M$164.25M$219.48M
$25.20M$28.13M$30.32M

OWL vs. RNST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
OWL
Blue Owl Capital Inc.
-28.04%-32.83%61.76%47.40%-26.29%32.18%5.86%
RNST
Renasant Corporation
25.22%0.98%9.12%-7.70%1.70%15.28%0.39%

Correlation

The correlation between OWL and RNST is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2020

0.37

The correlation between OWL and RNST shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

OWL:

$16.10B

RNST:

$3.98B

EPS

OWL:

$0.19

RNST:

$3.32

PE Ratio

OWL:

53.57

RNST:

13.11

PS Ratio

OWL:

2.33

RNST:

2.90

PB Ratio

OWL:

3.55

RNST:

1.05

Total Revenue (TTM)

OWL:

$2.99B

RNST:

$1.42B

Gross Profit (TTM)

OWL:

$1.83B

RNST:

$470.09M

EBITDA (TTM)

OWL:

$861.39M

RNST:

$513.28M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OWL vs. RNST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OWL
OWL Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
OWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
OWL Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
OWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
OWL Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

RNST
RNST Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
RNST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNST Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNST Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
RNST Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNST Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OWL vs. RNST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) and Renasant Corporation (RNST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OWLRNSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.17

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.75

1.27

-2.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.16

2.92

-4.07

OWL vs. RNST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OWL Sharpe Ratio is -0.96, which is lower than the RNST Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OWL and RNST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OWL vs. RNST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OWL drawdown since its inception was -67.10%, smaller than the maximum RNST drawdown of -73.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OWL and RNST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OWLRNSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.10%

-73.06%

+5.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.61%

-17.19%

-40.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.10%

-29.28%

-37.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.10%

-41.15%

-25.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.86%

-1.54%

-56.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.02%

-19.17%

-5.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.12%

7.51%

+29.61%

Volatility

OWL vs. RNST - Volatility Comparison

Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) has a higher volatility of 11.24% compared to Renasant Corporation (RNST) at 5.77%. This indicates that OWL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RNST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OWLRNSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.24%

5.77%

+5.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.60%

17.55%

+18.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.91%

25.93%

+18.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.11%

30.88%

+11.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.72%

32.70%

+10.02%

Dividends

OWL vs. RNST - Dividend Comparison

OWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.79%, more than RNST's 2.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OWL
Blue Owl Capital Inc.
8.79%5.72%2.92%3.69%4.06%0.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RNST
Renasant Corporation
2.11%2.53%2.46%2.61%2.34%2.32%2.61%2.46%2.65%1.79%1.68%1.98%

Financials

OWL vs. RNST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Blue Owl Capital Inc. and Renasant Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

OWL vs. RNST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Blue Owl Capital Inc. and Renasant Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

OWL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Blue Owl Capital Inc. reported a gross profit of 308.17M and revenue of 753.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.9%.

RNST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Renasant Corporation reported a gross profit of -264.35M and revenue of 291.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -90.7%.

OWL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Blue Owl Capital Inc. reported an operating income of 116.41M and revenue of 753.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.5%.

RNST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Renasant Corporation reported an operating income of -110.42M and revenue of 291.57M, resulting in an operating margin of -37.9%.

OWL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Blue Owl Capital Inc. reported a net income of 60.66M and revenue of 753.05M, resulting in a net margin of 8.1%.

RNST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Renasant Corporation reported a net income of 87.09M and revenue of 291.57M, resulting in a net margin of 29.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


OWL and RNST have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OWL has higher volatility (11.24%) compared to RNST (5.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OWL dropped -67.10% vs RNST's -73.06%.

RNST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OWL and RNST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer