PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OUSM vs. QSML
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

OUSM vs. QSML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) and Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund (QSML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

OUSM vs. QSML - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
OUSM
OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF
0.48%2.17%12.91%
QSML
Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund
-3.09%5.49%10.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OUSM achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly higher than QSML's -3.09% return.


OUSM

1D
1.77%
1M
-5.83%
YTD
0.48%
6M
-1.18%
1Y
6.34%
3Y*
9.43%
5Y*
6.87%
10Y*

QSML

1D
2.75%
1M
-5.17%
YTD
-3.09%
6M
-0.81%
1Y
15.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


OUSM vs. QSML - Expense Ratio Comparison

OUSM has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than QSML's 0.38% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

OUSM vs. QSML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OUSM
OUSM Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
OUSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSM Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSM Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

QSML
QSML Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
QSML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSML Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSML Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
QSML Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSML Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OUSM vs. QSML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) and Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund (QSML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OUSMQSMLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.38

0.67

-0.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.68

1.14

-0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.14

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.57

1.03

-0.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.89

3.82

-1.94

OUSM vs. QSML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OUSM Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the QSML Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OUSM and QSML, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OUSMQSMLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

0.67

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.27

+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between OUSM and QSML is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

OUSM vs. QSML - Dividend Comparison

OUSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, more than QSML's 0.64% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
OUSM
OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF
2.14%2.09%1.62%1.64%1.98%1.55%2.02%1.99%2.63%2.17%
QSML
Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund
0.64%0.62%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

OUSM vs. QSML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OUSM drawdown since its inception was -39.84%, which is greater than QSML's maximum drawdown of -28.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSM and QSML.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


OUSMQSMLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.84%

-28.54%

-11.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.68%

-14.44%

+2.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.49%

-8.26%

+0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-6.31%

+1.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

3.89%

-0.37%

Volatility

OUSM vs. QSML - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) is 4.29%, while Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund (QSML) has a volatility of 6.17%. This indicates that OUSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QSML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


OUSMQSMLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

6.17%

-1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.31%

12.94%

-3.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.95%

22.86%

-5.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.30%

21.27%

-4.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.04%

21.27%

-2.23%