OUSM vs. MSSM
OUSM (OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF) and MSSM (Morgan Stanley Pathway Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. OUSM is passively managed, while MSSM is actively managed. Over the past year, OUSM returned 10.89% vs 35.45% for MSSM. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OUSM charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for MSSM.
Performance
OUSM vs. MSSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OUSM achieves a 6.80% return, which is significantly lower than MSSM's 17.34% return.
OUSM
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 6.80%
- 6M
- 6.94%
- 1Y
- 10.89%
- 3Y*
- 11.71%
- 5Y*
- 7.39%
- 10Y*
- —
MSSM
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 17.34%
- 6M
- 17.18%
- 1Y
- 35.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OUSM vs. MSSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
OUSM OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF | 6.80% | 2.17% | -4.85% |
MSSM Morgan Stanley Pathway Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF | 17.34% | 11.33% | -5.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between OUSM and MSSM is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2024 | 0.81 |
The correlation between OUSM and MSSM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OUSM vs. MSSM — Risk / Return Rank
OUSM
MSSM
OUSM vs. MSSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) and Morgan Stanley Pathway Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (MSSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OUSM | MSSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.35 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.19 | 3.75 | -2.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.47 | 14.47 | -11.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OUSM | MSSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 2.07 | -1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.73 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
OUSM vs. MSSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OUSM drawdown since its inception was -39.84%, which is greater than MSSM's maximum drawdown of -24.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSM and MSSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OUSM | MSSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.84% | -24.18% | -15.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.21% | -9.50% | +0.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.67% | -0.79% | -0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.22% | -4.67% | -0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 2.46% | +0.68% |
Volatility
OUSM vs. MSSM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) is 3.66%, while Morgan Stanley Pathway Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (MSSM) has a volatility of 5.05%. This indicates that OUSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OUSM | MSSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.66% | 5.05% | -1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.25% | 12.76% | -3.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.15% | 17.27% | -4.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 20.91% | -4.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 20.91% | -1.97% |
OUSM vs. MSSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
OUSM has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than MSSM's 0.62% expense ratio.
Dividends
OUSM vs. MSSM - Dividend Comparison
OUSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than MSSM's 2.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSSM Morgan Stanley Pathway Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF | 2.69% | 3.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OUSM OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF | 2.07% | 2.09% | 1.62% | 1.64% | 1.98% | 1.55% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.63% | 2.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OUSM and MSSM have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSSM has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to OUSM (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUSM dropped -39.84% vs MSSM's -24.18%.
On 1-year performance, MSSM leads with 35.45% vs 10.89% for OUSM. On fees, OUSM is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, OUSM has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MSSM has performed better with a 35.45% return vs 10.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OUSM is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for MSSM.
MSSM has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 2.07% for OUSM.
They also come from different issuers: O'Shares Investments and Morgan Stanley. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OUSM and 0.62% for MSSM.
MSSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OUSM and MSSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer