MSSM vs. CSB
MSSM (Morgan Stanley Pathway Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF) and CSB (VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. MSSM is actively managed, while CSB is passively managed. Over the past year, MSSM returned 32.29% vs 19.17% for CSB. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MSSM charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CSB.
Performance
MSSM vs. CSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSSM achieves a 16.02% return, which is significantly higher than CSB's 10.19% return.
MSSM
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 16.02%
- 6M
- 15.49%
- 1Y
- 32.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSB
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- YTD
- 10.19%
- 6M
- 10.64%
- 1Y
- 19.17%
- 3Y*
- 11.27%
- 5Y*
- 3.98%
- 10Y*
- 9.77%
MSSM vs. CSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MSSM Morgan Stanley Pathway Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF | 16.02% | 11.33% | -7.04% |
CSB VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 10.19% | 2.26% | -4.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSSM and CSB is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2024 | 0.79 |
The correlation between MSSM and CSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSSM vs. CSB — Risk / Return Rank
MSSM
CSB
MSSM vs. CSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Pathway Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (MSSM) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSSM | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.24 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | 2.68 | +0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.10 | 7.71 | +5.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSSM | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 1.34 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.45 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
MSSM vs. CSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSSM drawdown since its inception was -25.16%, smaller than the maximum CSB drawdown of -42.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSSM and CSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSSM | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.16% | -42.07% | +16.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.50% | -7.18% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.95% | -1.43% | -0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.20% | -7.13% | +1.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.47% | 2.49% | -0.02% |
Volatility
MSSM vs. CSB - Volatility Comparison
Morgan Stanley Pathway Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (MSSM) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) at 3.67%. This indicates that MSSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSSM | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.49% | 3.67% | +1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.12% | 9.15% | +3.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.48% | 14.40% | +3.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.97% | 18.79% | +2.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.97% | 21.30% | -0.33% |
MSSM vs. CSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSSM has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than CSB's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSSM vs. CSB - Dividend Comparison
MSSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than CSB's 3.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSB VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.25% | 3.54% | 3.12% | 3.45% | 3.60% | 3.11% | 3.70% | 3.19% | 3.45% | 3.19% | 2.85% | 1.57% |
MSSM Morgan Stanley Pathway Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF | 2.72% | 3.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSSM and CSB have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSSM has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to CSB (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSSM dropped -25.16% vs CSB's -42.07%.
On 1-year performance, MSSM leads with 32.29% vs 19.17% for CSB. On fees, CSB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CSB has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MSSM has performed better with a 32.29% return vs 19.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for MSSM.
CSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.25%, compared with 2.72% for MSSM.
They also come from different issuers: Morgan Stanley and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for MSSM and 0.35% for CSB.
MSSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSSM and CSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer