OUSM vs. CALF
OUSM (OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF) and CALF (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - OUSM tracks the O'Shares US Small-Cap Quality Dividend Index while CALF tracks the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OUSM returned 7.39%/yr vs 4.12%/yr for CALF. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OUSM charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for CALF.
Performance
OUSM vs. CALF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OUSM achieves a 6.80% return, which is significantly lower than CALF's 13.34% return.
OUSM
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 6.80%
- 6M
- 6.94%
- 1Y
- 10.89%
- 3Y*
- 11.71%
- 5Y*
- 7.39%
- 10Y*
- —
CALF
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- YTD
- 13.34%
- 6M
- 12.53%
- 1Y
- 30.24%
- 3Y*
- 10.69%
- 5Y*
- 4.12%
- 10Y*
- —
OUSM vs. CALF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OUSM OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF | 6.80% | 2.17% | 13.45% | 18.82% | -7.89% | 21.45% | 7.64% | 28.04% | -10.60% | 6.48% |
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 13.34% | 2.33% | -7.41% | 35.43% | -15.20% | 40.68% | 16.55% | 18.18% | -10.06% | 5.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between OUSM and CALF is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2017 | 0.84 |
The correlation between OUSM and CALF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
OUSM vs. CALF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OUSM
CALF
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
-
Industrials
OUSM
CALF
Financial Services
OUSM
CALF
Consumer Cyclical
OUSM
CALF
Technology
OUSM
CALF
Healthcare
OUSM
CALF
Consumer Defensive
OUSM
CALF
Utilities
OUSM
CALF
-
Communication Services
OUSM
CALF
Basic Materials
OUSM
CALF
Energy
OUSM
CALF
Real Estate
OUSM
-
CALF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OUSM vs. CALF — Risk / Return Rank
OUSM
CALF
OUSM vs. CALF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OUSM | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.34 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.19 | 4.94 | -3.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.47 | 14.08 | -10.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OUSM | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 1.93 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.18 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.37 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
OUSM vs. CALF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OUSM drawdown since its inception was -39.84%, smaller than the maximum CALF drawdown of -47.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSM and CALF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OUSM | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.84% | -47.58% | +7.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.21% | -6.15% | -3.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.44% | -34.22% | +14.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.44% | -34.22% | +14.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.67% | -1.95% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.22% | -10.74% | +5.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 2.15% | +0.99% |
Volatility
OUSM vs. CALF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) is 3.66%, while Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) has a volatility of 4.92%. This indicates that OUSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CALF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OUSM | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.66% | 4.92% | -1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.25% | 10.47% | -1.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.15% | 15.84% | -2.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 23.44% | -7.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 26.02% | -7.08% |
OUSM vs. CALF - Expense Ratio Comparison
OUSM has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than CALF's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
OUSM vs. CALF - Dividend Comparison
OUSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than CALF's 1.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.28% | 1.43% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 2.63% | 0.82% | 0.99% | 1.39% | 0.70% |
OUSM OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF | 2.07% | 2.09% | 1.62% | 1.64% | 1.98% | 1.55% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.63% | 2.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OUSM and CALF have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CALF has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to OUSM (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUSM dropped -39.84% vs CALF's -47.58%.
On 5-year performance, OUSM leads with 7.39% vs 4.12% for CALF. On fees, OUSM is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, OUSM has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OUSM has performed better with a 7.39% return vs 4.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OUSM is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CALF.
OUSM has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 1.28% for CALF.
OUSM tracks O'Shares US Small-Cap Quality Dividend Index, while CALF tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index. They also come from different issuers: O'Shares Investments and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OUSM and 0.59% for CALF.
CALF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OUSM and CALF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer