OUSA vs. HLAL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

OUSA (OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF) and HLAL (Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - OUSA tracks the O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index while HLAL tracks the FTSE Shariah USA Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OUSA returned 8.62%/yr vs 15.86%/yr for HLAL. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OUSA charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HLAL.

Performance

OUSA vs. HLAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OUSA achieves a 1.05% return, which is significantly lower than HLAL's 18.72% return.

OUSA

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: 1.02%
• YTD: 1.05%
• 6M: 1.29%
• 1Y: 9.81%
• 3Y*: 12.63%
• 5Y*: 8.62%
• 10Y*: 10.22%

HLAL

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 9.45%
• YTD: 18.72%
• 6M: 17.75%
• 1Y: 43.63%
• 3Y*: 22.04%
• 5Y*: 15.86%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OUSA vs. HLAL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF	1.05%	10.23%	17.09%	13.44%	-9.33%	23.75%	6.96%	6.76%
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF	18.72%	18.30%	16.70%	30.13%	-17.56%	28.64%	24.65%	10.96%

Correlation

The correlation between OUSA and HLAL is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019	0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between OUSA and HLAL has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

OUSA vs. HLAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OUSA	HLAL
Technology	23.4%	50.4%
Financial Services	18.5%	0.0%
Healthcare	14.1%	10.5%
Consumer Cyclical	13.4%	5.6%
Industrials	11.6%	4.6%
Communication Services	11.4%	16.7%
Consumer Defensive	7.6%	2.9%
Basic Materials	-	2.5%
Energy	-	4.5%
Real Estate	-	0.8%
Utilities	-	1.0%

Return for Risk

OUSA vs. HLAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OUSA

OUSA Risk / Return Rank: 27
OUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
OUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
OUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 26
OUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
OUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 29

HLAL

HLAL Risk / Return Rank: 88
HLAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
HLAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
HLAL Omega Ratio Rank: 90
HLAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
HLAL Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OUSA vs. HLAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OUSA	HLAL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	3.33	-2.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.53	4.62	-3.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.59	-0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.18	4.30	-3.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.19	19.85	-15.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OUSA vs. HLAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the HLAL Sharpe Ratio of 3.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OUSA and HLAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OUSA	HLAL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.01	3.33	-2.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.91	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.89	-0.21

Drawdowns

OUSA vs. HLAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OUSA drawdown since its inception was -33.12%, roughly equal to the maximum HLAL drawdown of -33.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSA and HLAL.

Drawdown Indicators

	OUSA	HLAL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.12%	-33.57%	+0.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.36%	-10.20%	+1.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.14%	-21.67%	+8.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.54%	-23.18%	+3.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.58%	-0.07%	-2.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.53%	-5.00%	+1.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.35%	2.20%	+0.15%

Volatility

OUSA vs. HLAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) is 2.25%, while Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that OUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HLAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OUSA	HLAL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.25%	3.70%	-1.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.18%	9.95%	-2.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.75%	13.17%	-3.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.30%	17.60%	-4.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.16%	20.21%	-5.05%

OUSA vs. HLAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

OUSA has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than HLAL's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

OUSA vs. HLAL - Dividend Comparison

OUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than HLAL's 0.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF	0.44%	0.53%	0.58%	0.72%	1.15%	0.78%	0.97%	0.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF	1.42%	1.39%	1.50%	1.81%	1.92%	1.56%	2.03%	2.31%	3.06%	2.15%	2.32%	1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OUSA and HLAL in my portfolio?

OUSA and HLAL have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OUSA or HLAL?

HLAL has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to OUSA (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUSA dropped -33.12% vs HLAL's -33.57%.

Which ETF is better, OUSA or HLAL?

On 5-year performance, HLAL leads with 15.86% vs 8.62% for OUSA. On fees, OUSA is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, OUSA has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OUSA or HLAL?

Over the 5-year period, HLAL has performed better with a 15.86% return vs 8.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OUSA or HLAL?

OUSA is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HLAL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OUSA or HLAL?

OUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.44% for HLAL.

What is the main difference between OUSA and HLAL?

OUSA tracks O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index, while HLAL tracks FTSE Shariah USA Index. They also come from different issuers: O'Shares Investments and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OUSA and 0.50% for HLAL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HLAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.