OUNZ vs. PHYS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Merk Gold Trust (OUNZ) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS).

OUNZ is a passively managed fund by Merk that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). It was launched on May 16, 2014.

Performance

OUNZ vs. PHYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Merk Gold Trust (OUNZ) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

OUNZ vs. PHYS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
OUNZ VanEck Merk Gold Trust	8.61%	63.95%	26.75%	12.83%	-0.51%	-4.00%	24.71%	18.00%	-2.06%	12.82%
PHYS Sprott Physical Gold Trust	7.33%	63.95%	26.43%	12.98%	-1.81%	-4.84%	23.89%	18.14%	-2.64%	12.78%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OUNZ achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly higher than PHYS's 7.33% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with OUNZ having a 14.00% annualized return and PHYS not far behind at 13.41%.

OUNZ

• 1D: 3.75%
• 1M: -11.06%
• YTD: 8.61%
• 6M: 21.13%
• 1Y: 49.47%
• 3Y*: 33.11%
• 5Y*: 21.74%
• 10Y*: 14.00%

PHYS

• 1D: 3.81%
• 1M: -11.73%
• YTD: 7.33%
• 6M: 19.65%
• 1Y: 47.30%
• 3Y*: 31.85%
• 5Y*: 21.17%
• 10Y*: 13.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

OUNZ vs. PHYS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OUNZ

OUNZ Risk / Return Rank: 87
OUNZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
OUNZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
OUNZ Omega Ratio Rank: 86
OUNZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
OUNZ Martin Ratio Rank: 87

PHYS

PHYS Risk / Return Rank: 84
PHYS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
PHYS Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
PHYS Omega Ratio Rank: 83
PHYS Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
PHYS Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OUNZ vs. PHYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Merk Gold Trust (OUNZ) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OUNZ	PHYS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	1.67	+0.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	2.05	+0.19
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.31	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	2.52	+0.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.98	9.16	+0.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OUNZ vs. PHYS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OUNZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the PHYS Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OUNZ and PHYS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OUNZ	PHYS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.80	1.67	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.24	1.18	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88	0.83	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.47	+0.23

Correlation

The correlation between OUNZ and PHYS is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

OUNZ vs. PHYS - Dividend Comparison

Neither OUNZ nor PHYS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

OUNZ vs. PHYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OUNZ drawdown since its inception was -21.77%, smaller than the maximum PHYS drawdown of -48.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUNZ and PHYS.

Drawdown Indicators

	OUNZ	PHYS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.77%	-48.16%	+26.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.14%	-19.35%	+0.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.01%	-21.80%	+0.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.76%	-23.75%	+1.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.18%	-13.41%	+0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.48%	-21.07%	+13.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.17%	5.33%	-0.16%

Volatility

OUNZ vs. PHYS - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Merk Gold Trust (OUNZ) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) have volatilities of 10.95% and 11.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OUNZ	PHYS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.95%	11.34%	-0.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.08%	25.16%	-1.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.59%	28.55%	-0.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.65%	18.02%	-0.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.88%	16.25%	-0.37%