OUNZ vs. GLTR
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Merk Gold Trust (OUNZ) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR).
OUNZ and GLTR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. OUNZ is a passively managed fund by Merk that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). It was launched on May 16, 2014. GLTR is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. It was launched on Oct 22, 2010. Both OUNZ and GLTR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
OUNZ vs. GLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
OUNZ vs. GLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OUNZ VanEck Merk Gold Trust | 10.51% | 63.95% | 26.75% | 12.83% | -0.51% | -4.00% | 24.71% | 18.00% | -2.06% | 12.82% |
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | 7.45% | 87.25% | 20.63% | 2.01% | -0.25% | -9.60% | 29.52% | 20.96% | -2.85% | 12.94% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OUNZ achieves a 10.51% return, which is significantly higher than GLTR's 7.45% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with OUNZ having a 14.20% annualized return and GLTR not far ahead at 14.22%.
OUNZ
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- -10.64%
- YTD
- 10.51%
- 6M
- 23.09%
- 1Y
- 52.39%
- 3Y*
- 33.89%
- 5Y*
- 22.16%
- 10Y*
- 14.20%
GLTR
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -13.18%
- YTD
- 7.45%
- 6M
- 32.87%
- 1Y
- 71.49%
- 3Y*
- 34.29%
- 5Y*
- 18.60%
- 10Y*
- 14.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OUNZ vs. GLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
OUNZ has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than GLTR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
OUNZ vs. GLTR — Risk / Return Rank
OUNZ
GLTR
OUNZ vs. GLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Merk Gold Trust (OUNZ) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OUNZ | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.91 | 1.94 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.33 | 2.17 | +0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.37 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.72 | 2.38 | +0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.98 | 8.16 | +1.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OUNZ | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 1.94 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.26 | 0.81 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | 0.70 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.35 | +0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between OUNZ and GLTR is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
OUNZ vs. GLTR - Dividend Comparison
Neither OUNZ nor GLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
OUNZ vs. GLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OUNZ drawdown since its inception was -21.77%, smaller than the maximum GLTR drawdown of -55.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUNZ and GLTR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| OUNZ | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.77% | -55.70% | +33.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.14% | -29.70% | +10.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.01% | -29.70% | +8.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.76% | -29.70% | +7.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.66% | -22.55% | +10.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.48% | -28.89% | +21.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.22% | 8.65% | -3.43% |
Volatility
OUNZ vs. GLTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Merk Gold Trust (OUNZ) is 10.39%, while Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) has a volatility of 12.22%. This indicates that OUNZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| OUNZ | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.39% | 12.22% | -1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.13% | 35.76% | -11.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.61% | 37.11% | -9.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.66% | 23.15% | -5.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.89% | 20.27% | -4.38% |