MED vs. IVV

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Medifast, Inc. (MED) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV).

IVV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 15, 2000.

Performance

MED vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Medifast, Inc. (MED) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MED vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MED Medifast, Inc.	-4.59%	-39.39%	-73.79%	-38.34%	-42.31%	9.36%	86.18%	-9.73%	82.11%	72.33%
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF	-4.38%	17.85%	24.93%	26.31%	-18.16%	28.76%	18.40%	31.07%	-4.49%	21.75%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MED having a -4.59% return and IVV slightly higher at -4.38%. Over the past 10 years, MED has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of -7.88%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 14.02% annualized return.

MED

• 1D: 2.00%
• 1M: -3.23%
• YTD: -4.59%
• 6M: -25.46%
• 1Y: -24.41%
• 3Y*: -53.24%
• 5Y*: -44.69%
• 10Y*: -7.88%

IVV

• 1D: 2.88%
• 1M: -4.99%
• YTD: -4.38%
• 6M: -1.80%
• 1Y: 17.69%
• 3Y*: 18.29%
• 5Y*: 11.76%
• 10Y*: 14.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MED vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MED

MED Risk / Return Rank: 16
MED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
MED Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
MED Omega Ratio Rank: 17
MED Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
MED Martin Ratio Rank: 14

IVV

IVV Risk / Return Rank: 65
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 66
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MED vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Medifast, Inc. (MED) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MED	IVV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.64	0.97	-1.61
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.75	1.49	-2.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.23	-0.31
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.70	1.53	-2.24
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.37	7.32	-8.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MED vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MED Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is lower than the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MED and IVV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MED	IVV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.64	0.97	-1.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-1.00	0.70	-1.70
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.17	0.78	-0.95
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	0.42	-0.40

Correlation

The correlation between MED and IVV is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MED vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

MED has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MED Medifast, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	7.36%	5.69%	2.71%	2.30%	3.08%	1.75%	2.06%	2.57%	0.82%
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF	1.23%	1.17%	1.30%	1.44%	1.66%	1.20%	1.57%	1.85%	2.21%	1.75%	2.01%	2.27%

Drawdowns

MED vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MED drawdown since its inception was -98.40%, which is greater than IVV's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MED and IVV.

Drawdown Indicators

	MED	IVV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.40%	-55.25%	-43.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.39%	-12.06%	-25.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-96.76%	-24.53%	-72.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-96.76%	-33.90%	-62.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-96.54%	-6.26%	-90.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.56%	-10.85%	-39.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.18%	2.53%	+16.65%

Volatility

MED vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

Medifast, Inc. (MED) has a higher volatility of 12.03% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 5.30%. This indicates that MED's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MED	IVV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.03%	5.30%	+6.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.44%	9.45%	+14.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.63%	18.31%	+20.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.85%	16.89%	+27.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.09%	18.04%	+29.05%