MED vs. IVV
Compare and contrast key facts about Medifast, Inc. (MED) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV).
IVV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 15, 2000.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MED or IVV.
Correlation
The correlation between MED and IVV is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
MED vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MED:
-1.38
IVV:
2.25
MED:
-2.69
IVV:
2.98
MED:
0.68
IVV:
1.42
MED:
-0.79
IVV:
3.32
MED:
-1.21
IVV:
14.68
MED:
61.96%
IVV:
1.90%
MED:
54.22%
IVV:
12.43%
MED:
-98.33%
IVV:
-55.25%
MED:
-94.25%
IVV:
-2.52%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MED achieves a -74.83% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 25.92% return. Over the past 10 years, MED has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of -3.96%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 13.05% annualized return.
MED
-74.83%
-6.83%
-15.53%
-75.18%
-28.13%
-3.96%
IVV
25.92%
0.33%
9.27%
26.64%
14.77%
13.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MED vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Medifast, Inc. (MED) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MED vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
MED has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MED Medifast, Inc. | 0.00% | 7.36% | 5.69% | 2.71% | 2.30% | 3.08% | 1.75% | 2.06% | 2.57% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.29% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.99% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% | 1.83% | 1.80% |
Drawdowns
MED vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MED drawdown since its inception was -98.33%, which is greater than IVV's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MED and IVV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MED vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
Medifast, Inc. (MED) has a higher volatility of 14.87% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 3.75%. This indicates that MED's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.