MED vs. GPC
Compare and contrast key facts about Medifast, Inc. (MED) and Genuine Parts Company (GPC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MED or GPC.
Key characteristics
| MED | GPC | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -59.04% | 14.26% |
| 1Y Return | -68.38% | -5.56% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -48.55% | 10.74% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -25.41% | 12.18% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 1.38% | 9.32% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -1.37 | -0.16 |
| Daily Std Dev | 50.15% | 25.42% |
| Max Drawdown | -98.33% | -54.89% |
| Current Drawdown | -90.64% | -13.33% |
Fundamentals
| MED | GPC | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $367.29M | $22.28B |
| EPS | $9.10 | $8.97 |
| PE Ratio | 3.70 | 17.83 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.95 | 3.02 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.07B | $23.11B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $1.14B | $7.74B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $139.51M | $2.15B |
Correlation
The correlation between MED and GPC is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
MED vs. GPC - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, MED achieves a -59.04% return, which is significantly lower than GPC's 14.26% return. Over the past 10 years, MED has underperformed GPC with an annualized return of 1.38%, while GPC has yielded a comparatively higher 9.32% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MED vs. GPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Medifast, Inc. (MED) and Genuine Parts Company (GPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MED vs. GPC - Dividend Comparison
MED's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.99%, more than GPC's 2.45% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MED Medifast, Inc. | 11.99% | 7.36% | 5.69% | 2.71% | 2.30% | 3.08% | 1.75% | 2.06% | 2.57% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GPC Genuine Parts Company | 2.45% | 2.74% | 2.06% | 2.33% | 3.15% | 2.87% | 3.00% | 2.84% | 2.75% | 2.86% | 2.16% | 2.58% |
Drawdowns
MED vs. GPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MED drawdown since its inception was -98.33%, which is greater than GPC's maximum drawdown of -54.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MED and GPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MED vs. GPC - Volatility Comparison
Medifast, Inc. (MED) has a higher volatility of 28.35% compared to Genuine Parts Company (GPC) at 12.04%. This indicates that MED's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
MED vs. GPC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Medifast, Inc. and Genuine Parts Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities