OSEA vs. IDHQ
OSEA (Harbor International Compounders ETF) and IDHQ (Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OSEA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Harbor, while IDHQ is a Quality Factor fund tracking the IDHQ-US - S&P Quality Developed Ex-U.S. LargeMidCap Index. OSEA is actively managed, while IDHQ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, OSEA returned 7.19%/yr vs 19.52%/yr for IDHQ. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. OSEA charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for IDHQ.
Performance
OSEA vs. IDHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OSEA achieves a 0.69% return, which is significantly lower than IDHQ's 26.27% return.
OSEA
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.69%
- 1Y
- 9.18%
- 3Y*
- 7.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.41%
IDHQ
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 17.73%
- YTD
- 26.27%
- 1Y
- 41.32%
- 3Y*
- 19.52%
- 5Y*
- 9.70%
- 10Y*
- 10.64%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.89M | $6.19M | $5.51M | |
| $1.60M | $1.39M | $1.57M |
OSEA vs. IDHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OSEA Harbor International Compounders ETF | 0.69% | 18.49% | -0.73% | 20.88% | 10.14% |
IDHQ Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF | 26.27% | 27.46% | 1.33% | 18.80% | 7.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between OSEA and IDHQ is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022 | 0.87 |
The correlation between OSEA and IDHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OSEA vs. IDHQ — Risk / Return Rank
OSEA
IDHQ
OSEA vs. IDHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor International Compounders ETF (OSEA) and Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF (IDHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OSEA | IDHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.36 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 3.03 | -2.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.45 | 12.14 | -9.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OSEA vs. IDHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OSEA drawdown since its inception was -18.14%, smaller than the maximum IDHQ drawdown of -73.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSEA and IDHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OSEA | IDHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.14% | -73.84% | +55.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.08% | -13.44% | +2.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.14% | -14.07% | -4.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.12% | -1.04% | -2.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.84% | -21.03% | +17.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.39% | 3.35% | +0.04% |
Volatility
OSEA vs. IDHQ - Volatility Comparison
Harbor International Compounders ETF (OSEA) and Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF (IDHQ) have volatilities of 4.22% and 4.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OSEA | IDHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.22% | 4.17% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.00% | 18.92% | -5.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.68% | 20.74% | -5.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.61% | 17.85% | -1.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.61% | 17.97% | -1.36% |
OSEA vs. IDHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
OSEA has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than IDHQ's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
OSEA vs. IDHQ - Dividend Comparison
OSEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than IDHQ's 2.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDHQ Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF | 2.01% | 2.46% | 2.41% | 2.52% | 3.33% | 2.10% | 1.60% | 2.10% | 2.67% | 1.68% | 2.36% | 1.71% |
OSEA Harbor International Compounders ETF | 1.23% | 1.24% | 0.51% | 0.65% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OSEA and IDHQ have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OSEA has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to IDHQ (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OSEA dropped -18.14% vs IDHQ's -73.84%.
On 3-year performance, IDHQ leads with 19.52% vs 7.19% for OSEA. On fees, IDHQ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IDHQ has performed better with a 19.52% return vs 7.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDHQ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for OSEA.
IDHQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 1.23% for OSEA.
OSEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IDHQ is Quality Factor. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for OSEA and 0.29% for IDHQ.
IDHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OSEA and IDHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer