PortfoliosLab logo
OSEA vs. IMOM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between OSEA and IMOM is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

OSEA vs. IMOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor International Compounders ETF (OSEA) and Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

OSEA:

17.83%

IMOM:

6.35%

Max Drawdown

OSEA:

-18.14%

IMOM:

-1.11%

Current Drawdown

OSEA:

-4.77%

IMOM:

-1.11%

Returns By Period


OSEA

YTD

7.47%

1M

10.19%

6M

2.01%

1Y

0.69%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

IMOM

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


OSEA vs. IMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

OSEA has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than IMOM's 0.59% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

OSEA vs. IMOM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OSEA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of OSEA is 2525
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of OSEA is 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of OSEA is 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of OSEA is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of OSEA is 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of OSEA is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

IMOM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IMOM is 6666
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IMOM is 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IMOM is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IMOM is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IMOM is 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IMOM is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

OSEA vs. IMOM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor International Compounders ETF (OSEA) and Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

OSEA vs. IMOM - Dividend Comparison

OSEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than IMOM's 3.96% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OSEA
Harbor International Compounders ETF
0.48%0.51%0.65%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IMOM
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF
3.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

OSEA vs. IMOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OSEA drawdown since its inception was -18.14%, which is greater than IMOM's maximum drawdown of -1.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSEA and IMOM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

OSEA vs. IMOM - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...