OSEA vs. IMOM
Compare and contrast key facts about Harbor International Compounders ETF (OSEA) and Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM).
OSEA and IMOM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. OSEA is an actively managed fund by Harbor. It was launched on Sep 6, 2022. IMOM is a passively managed fund by EMPIRICAL FINANCE LLC that tracks the performance of the Alpha Architect Intern.Quan. Mome. (USD)(TR). It was launched on Dec 23, 2015.
Performance
OSEA vs. IMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
OSEA vs. IMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OSEA Harbor International Compounders ETF | -2.63% | 18.49% | -0.73% | 20.88% | 9.77% |
IMOM Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF | 7.41% | 47.20% | 5.22% | 9.15% | 4.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OSEA achieves a -2.63% return, which is significantly lower than IMOM's 7.41% return.
OSEA
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- -4.43%
- YTD
- -2.63%
- 6M
- -0.29%
- 1Y
- 12.29%
- 3Y*
- 7.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IMOM
- 1D
- 2.80%
- 1M
- -8.99%
- YTD
- 7.41%
- 6M
- 14.57%
- 1Y
- 48.49%
- 3Y*
- 19.56%
- 5Y*
- 7.12%
- 10Y*
- 7.49%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OSEA vs. IMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
OSEA has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than IMOM's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
OSEA vs. IMOM — Risk / Return Rank
OSEA
IMOM
OSEA vs. IMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor International Compounders ETF (OSEA) and Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OSEA | IMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.72 | 2.16 | -1.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 2.73 | -1.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.42 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | 3.13 | -2.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.15 | 13.32 | -9.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OSEA | IMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | 2.16 | -1.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.35 | +0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between OSEA and IMOM is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
OSEA vs. IMOM - Dividend Comparison
OSEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than IMOM's 2.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OSEA Harbor International Compounders ETF | 1.28% | 1.24% | 0.51% | 0.65% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IMOM Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF | 2.35% | 2.53% | 4.52% | 2.95% | 6.06% | 1.27% | 0.59% | 1.17% | 0.78% | 1.11% | 0.54% |
Drawdowns
OSEA vs. IMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OSEA drawdown since its inception was -18.14%, smaller than the maximum IMOM drawdown of -45.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSEA and IMOM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| OSEA | IMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.14% | -45.74% | +27.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.08% | -15.61% | +4.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.26% | -9.61% | +3.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.85% | -14.37% | +10.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 3.66% | -0.68% |
Volatility
OSEA vs. IMOM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harbor International Compounders ETF (OSEA) is 7.00%, while Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) has a volatility of 10.33%. This indicates that OSEA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| OSEA | IMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.00% | 10.33% | -3.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.90% | 15.36% | -4.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.24% | 22.51% | -5.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.53% | 19.95% | -3.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.53% | 20.10% | -3.57% |