ORO vs. MATE

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ORO (Arrow Valtoro ETF) and MATE (Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ORO charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for MATE.

Performance

ORO vs. MATE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arrow Valtoro ETF (ORO) and Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ORO achieves a -0.13% return, which is significantly lower than MATE's 14.21% return.

ORO

• 1D: -2.52%
• 1M: -7.86%
• YTD: -0.13%
• 6M: -3.06%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MATE

• 1D: -2.79%
• 1M: -3.88%
• YTD: 14.21%
• 6M: 12.51%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ORO vs. MATE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ORO Arrow Valtoro ETF	-0.13%	-0.27%
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF	14.21%	2.65%

Correlation

The correlation between ORO and MATE is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025	0.56

Return for Risk

ORO vs. MATE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow Valtoro ETF (ORO) and Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

ORO vs. MATE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ORO drawdown since its inception was -12.89%, roughly equal to the maximum MATE drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ORO and MATE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ORO	MATE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.89%	-13.24%	+0.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.89%	-5.50%	-7.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.71%	-3.35%	-3.36%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ORO	MATE	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.53%	23.25%	+0.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.53%	23.25%	+0.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.53%	23.25%	+0.28%

ORO vs. MATE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ORO has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MATE's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

ORO vs. MATE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ORO nor MATE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ORO and MATE in my portfolio?

ORO and MATE have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ORO or MATE?

On fees, MATE is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ORO or MATE?

MATE is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for ORO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ORO or MATE?

ORO and MATE have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between ORO and MATE?

They also come from different issuers: Arrow Funds and Man Group. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for ORO and 0.97% for MATE.