ORO vs. RHRX
ORO (Arrow Valtoro ETF) and RHRX (RH Tactical Rotation ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ORO charges 1.25%/yr vs 1.36%/yr for RHRX.
Performance
ORO vs. RHRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ORO achieves a -0.52% return, which is significantly lower than RHRX's 16.73% return.
ORO
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- 6M
- -3.40%
- YTD
- -0.52%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
RHRX
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- 6M
- 14.17%
- YTD
- 16.73%
- 1Y
- 30.09%
- 3Y*
- 18.76%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.77%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.26K | $2.84K | $3.33K | |
| $188.47K | $260.91K | $203.87K |
ORO vs. RHRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ORO Arrow Valtoro ETF | -0.52% | -9.23% |
RHRX RH Tactical Rotation ETF | 16.73% | 1.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between ORO and RHRX is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2025 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ORO vs. RHRX — Risk / Return Rank
ORO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RHRX
ORO vs. RHRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow Valtoro ETF (ORO) and RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ORO | RHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.08 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.62 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ORO vs. RHRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ORO drawdown since its inception was -14.25%, smaller than the maximum RHRX drawdown of -25.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ORO and RHRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ORO | RHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.25% | -25.33% | +11.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.23% | -4.39% | -8.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.50% | -8.75% | +1.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.21% | — |
Volatility
ORO vs. RHRX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ORO | RHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.30% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.33% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.09% | 14.43% | +8.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.09% | 18.98% | +4.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.09% | 18.98% | +4.11% |
ORO vs. RHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ORO has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is lower than RHRX's 1.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
ORO vs. RHRX - Dividend Comparison
Neither ORO nor RHRX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ORO and RHRX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ORO is cheaper at 1.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ORO is cheaper with a 1.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.36% for RHRX.
ORO and RHRX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Arrow Funds and Adaptive. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for ORO and 1.36% for RHRX.
Find the right allocation for ORO and RHRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer