ORO vs. GMOD
ORO (Arrow Valtoro ETF) and GMOD (GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ORO charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GMOD.
Performance
ORO vs. GMOD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ORO achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than GMOD's 7.50% return.
ORO
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- -4.97%
- 6M
- -6.10%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GMOD
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- 6M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 7.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ORO vs. GMOD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ORO Arrow Valtoro ETF | 0.33% | -9.23% |
GMOD GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF | 7.50% | 3.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between ORO and GMOD is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2025 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ORO vs. GMOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow Valtoro ETF (ORO) and GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ORO vs. GMOD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ORO drawdown since its inception was -14.25%, which is greater than GMOD's maximum drawdown of -6.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ORO and GMOD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ORO | GMOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.25% | -6.50% | -7.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.50% | -0.55% | -11.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.23% | -1.09% | -6.14% |
Volatility
ORO vs. GMOD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ORO | GMOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.42% | 8.83% | +14.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.42% | 8.83% | +14.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.42% | 8.83% | +14.59% |
ORO vs. GMOD - Expense Ratio Comparison
ORO has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than GMOD's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ORO vs. GMOD - Dividend Comparison
ORO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GMOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GMOD GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF | 1.37% | 0.93% |
ORO Arrow Valtoro ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ORO and GMOD have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GMOD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GMOD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for ORO.
GMOD has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.00% for ORO.
They also come from different issuers: Arrow Funds and GMO. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for ORO and 0.50% for GMOD.
Find the right allocation for ORO and GMOD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer