ORCX vs. NAMM

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

ORCX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF) is Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while NAMM (Namib Minerals) is a stock. Over the past year, ORCX returned -83.80% vs -82.08% for NAMM. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ORCX vs. NAMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF (ORCX) and Namib Minerals (NAMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ORCX achieves a -68.21% return, which is significantly lower than NAMM's 39.60% return.

ORCX

• 1D: -12.56%
• 1M: -57.85%
• 6M: -66.24%
• YTD: -68.21%
• 1Y: -83.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NAMM

• 1D: -2.08%
• 1M: -24.19%
• 6M: 50.00%
• YTD: 39.60%
• 1Y: -82.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ORCX vs. NAMM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ORCX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF	-68.21%	-2.71%
NAMM Namib Minerals	39.60%	-94.13%

Correlation

The correlation between ORCX and NAMM is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025	0.12

Return for Risk

ORCX vs. NAMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ORCX

ORCX Risk / Return Rank: 3
ORCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
ORCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
ORCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
ORCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
ORCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

NAMM

NAMM Risk / Return Rank: 22
NAMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
NAMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
NAMM Omega Ratio Rank: 29
NAMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
NAMM Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ORCX vs. NAMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF (ORCX) and Namib Minerals (NAMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ORCX	NAMM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.64	-0.40	-0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.30	-0.18	-1.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	0.98	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.93	-0.92	-0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.31	-1.13	-0.18

ORCX vs. NAMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ORCX Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is lower than the NAMM Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ORCX and NAMM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ORCX vs. NAMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ORCX drawdown since its inception was -90.20%, smaller than the maximum NAMM drawdown of -97.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ORCX and NAMM.

Drawdown Indicators

	ORCX	NAMM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.20%	-97.05%	+6.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-90.20%	-89.30%	-0.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-90.20%	-95.48%	+5.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.27%	-88.90%	+41.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	63.85%	72.74%	-8.89%

Volatility

ORCX vs. NAMM - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF (ORCX) has a higher volatility of 26.36% compared to Namib Minerals (NAMM) at 16.03%. This indicates that ORCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NAMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ORCX	NAMM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.36%	16.03%	+10.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	85.98%	148.16%	-62.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	130.39%	203.93%	-73.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	121.39%	223.10%	-101.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	121.39%	223.10%	-101.71%

Dividends

ORCX vs. NAMM - Dividend Comparison

Neither ORCX nor NAMM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ORCX and NAMM in my portfolio?

ORCX and NAMM have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ORCX or NAMM?

ORCX has higher volatility (26.36%) compared to NAMM (16.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ORCX dropped -90.20% vs NAMM's -97.05%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NAMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.40 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.