PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ORCX vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ORCX vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF (ORCX) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ORCX achieves a 31.34% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's 19.48% return.


ORCX

1D
-2.86%
1M
93.58%
YTD
31.34%
6M
18.48%
1Y
33.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDA

1D
-0.69%
1M
12.28%
YTD
19.48%
6M
22.81%
1Y
62.23%
3Y*
78.33%
5Y*
67.45%
10Y*
69.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ORCX vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ORCX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF
31.34%-16.20%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
19.48%43.68%

Correlation

The correlation between ORCX and NVDA is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2025

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ORCX vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ORCX
ORCX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
ORCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ORCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
ORCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
ORCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
ORCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ORCX vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF (ORCX) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ORCXNVDADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.27

1.84

-1.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.46

2.47

-1.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.30

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

3.21

-2.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.62

7.92

-7.30

ORCX vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ORCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ORCX and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ORCXNVDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

1.84

-1.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.63

-0.57

Drawdowns

ORCX vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ORCX drawdown since its inception was -85.98%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ORCX and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ORCXNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.98%

-89.72%

+3.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-85.98%

-20.21%

-65.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.52%

-5.48%

-54.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.34%

-36.21%

-8.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

57.35%

8.20%

+49.15%

Volatility

ORCX vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF (ORCX) has a higher volatility of 34.29% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 11.79%. This indicates that ORCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ORCXNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

34.29%

11.79%

+22.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

81.33%

25.29%

+56.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

127.43%

34.03%

+93.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

120.74%

51.66%

+69.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

120.74%

49.80%

+70.94%

Dividends

ORCX vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

ORCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
ORCX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ORCX and NVDA have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ORCX has higher volatility (34.29%) compared to NVDA (11.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ORCX dropped -85.98% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ORCX and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer