ORCX vs. NVDA
ORCX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF) is Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock. Over the past year, ORCX returned 33.67% vs 62.23% for NVDA. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ORCX vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ORCX achieves a 31.34% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's 19.48% return.
ORCX
- 1D
- -2.86%
- 1M
- 93.58%
- YTD
- 31.34%
- 6M
- 18.48%
- 1Y
- 33.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDA
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 12.28%
- YTD
- 19.48%
- 6M
- 22.81%
- 1Y
- 62.23%
- 3Y*
- 78.33%
- 5Y*
- 67.45%
- 10Y*
- 69.46%
ORCX vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ORCX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF | 31.34% | -16.20% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 19.48% | 43.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between ORCX and NVDA is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ORCX vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank
ORCX
NVDA
ORCX vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF (ORCX) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ORCX | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.27 | 1.84 | -1.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.46 | 2.47 | -1.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.30 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | 3.21 | -2.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.62 | 7.92 | -7.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ORCX | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | 1.84 | -1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.63 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
ORCX vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ORCX drawdown since its inception was -85.98%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ORCX and NVDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ORCX | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.98% | -89.72% | +3.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -85.98% | -20.21% | -65.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -36.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -66.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.52% | -5.48% | -54.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.34% | -36.21% | -8.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 57.35% | 8.20% | +49.15% |
Volatility
ORCX vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF (ORCX) has a higher volatility of 34.29% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 11.79%. This indicates that ORCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ORCX | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.29% | 11.79% | +22.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 81.33% | 25.29% | +56.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 127.43% | 34.03% | +93.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 120.74% | 51.66% | +69.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 120.74% | 49.80% | +70.94% |
Dividends
ORCX vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
ORCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
ORCX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ORCX and NVDA have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ORCX has higher volatility (34.29%) compared to NVDA (11.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ORCX dropped -85.98% vs NVDA's -89.72%.
NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ORCX and NVDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer