PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ORA vs. CCJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ORA vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ormat Technologies, Inc. (ORA) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ORA achieves a 31.61% return, which is significantly higher than CCJ's 25.22% return. Over the past 10 years, ORA has underperformed CCJ with an annualized return of 13.54%, while CCJ has yielded a comparatively higher 26.89% annualized return.


ORA

1D
0.43%
1M
26.62%
YTD
31.61%
6M
30.44%
1Y
93.88%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
16.85%
10Y*
13.54%

CCJ

1D
-4.94%
1M
-3.13%
YTD
25.22%
6M
28.07%
1Y
92.33%
3Y*
56.47%
5Y*
40.19%
10Y*
26.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ORA vs. CCJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ORA
Ormat Technologies, Inc.
31.61%64.06%-10.05%-11.82%9.68%-11.59%21.92%43.45%-17.42%20.50%
CCJ
Cameco Corporation
25.22%78.38%19.47%90.49%4.35%63.19%51.47%-21.08%23.58%-8.20%

Correlation

The correlation between ORA and CCJ is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2004

0.30

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ORA:

$8.99B

CCJ:

$49.91B

EPS

ORA:

$2.07

CCJ:

$1.49

PE Ratio

ORA:

70.06

CCJ:

76.67

PEG Ratio

ORA:

3.43

CCJ:

0.64

PS Ratio

ORA:

7.68

CCJ:

14.10

PB Ratio

ORA:

3.50

CCJ:

7.05

Total Revenue (TTM)

ORA:

$1.16B

CCJ:

$3.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ORA:

$320.13M

CCJ:

$1.04B

EBITDA (TTM)

ORA:

$398.22M

CCJ:

$996.66M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ORA vs. CCJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ORA
ORA Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ORA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ORA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ORA Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ORA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
ORA Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

CCJ
CCJ Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
CCJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
CCJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ORA vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ormat Technologies, Inc. (ORA) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ORACCJDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.12

1.69

+1.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.78

2.48

+1.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.29

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.71

3.61

+1.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.39

8.18

+5.22

ORA vs. CCJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ORA Sharpe Ratio is 3.12, which is higher than the CCJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ORA and CCJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ORACCJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.12

1.69

+1.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.81

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.58

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.24

+0.08

Drawdowns

ORA vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ORA drawdown since its inception was -73.96%, smaller than the maximum CCJ drawdown of -87.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ORA and CCJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ORACCJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.96%

-87.53%

+13.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.05%

-25.69%

+5.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.61%

-40.01%

+7.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.21%

-40.01%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.39%

-57.22%

+4.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-14.56%

+14.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.61%

-46.10%

+15.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.03%

11.33%

-4.30%

Volatility

ORA vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ormat Technologies, Inc. (ORA) is 11.39%, while Cameco Corporation (CCJ) has a volatility of 15.87%. This indicates that ORA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ORACCJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.39%

15.87%

-4.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.70%

38.06%

-13.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.31%

54.94%

-24.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.14%

49.69%

-18.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.14%

46.60%

-14.46%

Dividends

ORA vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison

ORA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, more than CCJ's 0.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCJ
Cameco Corporation
0.15%0.19%0.22%0.20%0.39%0.29%0.46%0.67%0.53%4.33%3.82%3.24%
ORA
Ormat Technologies, Inc.
0.33%0.43%0.71%0.63%0.56%0.61%0.49%0.59%1.01%0.91%0.97%0.71%

Financials

ORA vs. CCJ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ormat Technologies, Inc. and Cameco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
403.91M
847.55M
(ORA) Total Revenue
(CCJ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ORA vs. CCJ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ormat Technologies, Inc. and Cameco Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
29.8%
34.3%
Portfolio components
ORA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ormat Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 120.37M and revenue of 403.91M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.8%.

CCJ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a gross profit of 291.00M and revenue of 847.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.3%.

ORA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ormat Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of -4.13M and revenue of 403.91M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.0%.

CCJ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cameco Corporation reported an operating income of 154.28M and revenue of 847.55M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.

ORA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ormat Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 44.07M and revenue of 403.91M, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.

CCJ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a net income of 131.09M and revenue of 847.55M, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ORA and CCJ have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CCJ has higher volatility (15.87%) compared to ORA (11.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ORA dropped -73.96% vs CCJ's -87.53%.

ORA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ORA and CCJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer