ORA vs. CCJ
ORA (Ormat Technologies, Inc.) and CCJ (Cameco Corporation) are both stocks. ORA operates in Utilities - Renewable (Utilities), while CCJ operates in Uranium (Energy). Over the past 10 years, ORA returned 8.62%/yr vs 25.91%/yr for CCJ. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ORA vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ORA achieves a -11.49% return, which is significantly lower than CCJ's -5.59% return. Over the past 10 years, ORA has underperformed CCJ with an annualized return of 8.62%, while CCJ has yielded a comparatively higher 25.91% annualized return.
ORA
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -13.31%
- 6M
- -21.74%
- YTD
- -11.49%
- 1Y
- 10.49%
- 3Y*
- 7.10%
- 5Y*
- 7.58%
- 10Y*
- 8.62%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.66%
CCJ
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- -10.52%
- 6M
- -29.99%
- YTD
- -5.59%
- 1Y
- 18.67%
- 3Y*
- 36.00%
- 5Y*
- 37.49%
- 10Y*
- 25.91%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $353.80M | $350.26M | $354.16M | |
| $86.66M | $85.89M | $116.62M |
ORA vs. CCJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ORA Ormat Technologies, Inc. | -11.49% | 64.06% | -10.05% | -11.82% | 9.68% | -11.59% | 21.92% | 43.45% | -17.42% | 20.50% |
CCJ Cameco Corporation | -5.59% | 78.38% | 19.47% | 90.49% | 4.35% | 63.19% | 51.47% | -21.08% | 23.58% | -8.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between ORA and CCJ is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2004 | 0.30 |
The correlation between ORA and CCJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (3 years) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ORA:
$6.00B
CCJ:
$37.62B
ORA:
$2.06
CCJ:
CA$1.49
ORA:
47.27
CCJ:
81.00
ORA:
2.32
CCJ:
0.68
ORA:
5.18
CCJ:
14.89
ORA:
2.35
CCJ:
7.44
ORA:
$1.16B
CCJ:
CA$3.54B
ORA:
$320.13M
CCJ:
CA$1.04B
ORA:
$398.22M
CCJ:
CA$996.66M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ORA vs. CCJ — Risk / Return Rank
ORA
CCJ
ORA vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ormat Technologies, Inc. (ORA) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ORA | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.10 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.28 | 0.42 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.85 | 0.98 | -0.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ORA vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ORA drawdown since its inception was -73.96%, smaller than the maximum CCJ drawdown of -87.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ORA and CCJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ORA | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.96% | -87.53% | +13.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.99% | -36.93% | +1.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.99% | -40.01% | +5.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.21% | -40.01% | -1.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.39% | -57.22% | +4.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.75% | -35.58% | +2.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.53% | -46.00% | +15.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.31% | 15.91% | -4.60% |
Volatility
ORA vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ormat Technologies, Inc. (ORA) is 10.63%, while Cameco Corporation (CCJ) has a volatility of 11.91%. This indicates that ORA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ORA | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.63% | 11.91% | -1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.92% | 39.28% | -11.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.97% | 55.93% | -22.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.52% | 49.93% | -18.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.47% | 46.76% | -14.29% |
Dividends
ORA vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison
ORA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, more than CCJ's 0.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 0.20% | 0.19% | 0.22% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.29% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.53% | 4.33% | 3.82% | 3.24% |
ORA Ormat Technologies, Inc. | 0.49% | 0.43% | 0.71% | 0.63% | 0.56% | 0.61% | 0.49% | 0.59% | 1.01% | 0.91% | 0.97% | 0.71% |
Financials
ORA vs. CCJ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ormat Technologies, Inc. and Cameco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ORA vs. CCJ - Profitability Comparison
ORA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ormat Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 120.37M and revenue of 403.91M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.8%.
CCJ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a gross profit of 291.00M and revenue of 847.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.3%.
ORA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ormat Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of -4.13M and revenue of 403.91M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.0%.
CCJ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cameco Corporation reported an operating income of 154.28M and revenue of 847.55M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.
ORA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ormat Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 44.07M and revenue of 403.91M, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.
CCJ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a net income of 131.09M and revenue of 847.55M, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ORA and CCJ have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CCJ has higher volatility (11.91%) compared to ORA (10.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ORA dropped -73.96% vs CCJ's -87.53%.
ORA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.29 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ORA and CCJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer