PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OPPAX vs. FNGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OPPAX vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Global Fund (OPPAX) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OPPAX achieves a 5.85% return, which is significantly higher than FNGS's 4.83% return.


OPPAX

1D
-3.50%
1M
0.75%
YTD
5.85%
6M
4.94%
1Y
15.71%
3Y*
16.26%
5Y*
5.86%
10Y*
12.67%

FNGS

1D
-0.78%
1M
-4.32%
YTD
4.83%
6M
3.09%
1Y
14.55%
3Y*
28.96%
5Y*
17.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OPPAX vs. FNGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
OPPAX
Invesco Global Fund
5.85%15.20%16.16%34.18%-32.18%15.23%27.64%4.57%
FNGS
MicroSectors FANG+ ETN
4.83%18.64%51.99%95.24%-40.32%16.96%101.99%10.10%

Correlation

The correlation between OPPAX and FNGS is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2019

0.81

The correlation between OPPAX and FNGS shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OPPAX vs. FNGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OPPAX
OPPAX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
OPPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OPPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
OPPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
OPPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
OPPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

FNGS
FNGS Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FNGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNGS Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FNGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNGS Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OPPAX vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Fund (OPPAX) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OPPAXFNGSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.13

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

0.64

+0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.48

1.78

+2.69

OPPAX vs. FNGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OPPAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is higher than the FNGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OPPAX and FNGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OPPAX vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OPPAX drawdown since its inception was -60.39%, which is greater than FNGS's maximum drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OPPAX and FNGS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OPPAXFNGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.39%

-48.98%

-11.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.26%

-22.93%

+6.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.69%

-26.77%

+5.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.90%

-48.98%

+7.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.40%

-11.28%

+6.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.44%

-10.84%

-4.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.24%

8.17%

-3.93%

Volatility

OPPAX vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Global Fund (OPPAX) is 9.08%, while MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) has a volatility of 10.98%. This indicates that OPPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OPPAXFNGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.08%

10.98%

-1.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.73%

17.99%

-2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.78%

22.64%

-3.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.60%

30.26%

-8.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.72%

31.23%

-10.51%

OPPAX vs. FNGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

OPPAX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than FNGS's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

OPPAX vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison

OPPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.42%, while FNGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNGS
MicroSectors FANG+ ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OPPAX
Invesco Global Fund
23.42%24.79%11.93%10.72%14.18%7.18%5.72%1.35%12.92%5.92%0.69%5.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


OPPAX and FNGS have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNGS has higher volatility (10.98%) compared to OPPAX (9.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OPPAX dropped -60.39% vs FNGS's -48.98%.

OPPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OPPAX and FNGS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer