ONLN vs. TMH
ONLN (ProShares Online Retail ETF) and TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - ONLN tracks the ProShares Online Retail Index while TMH tracks the Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return. Both are passively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ONLN charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for TMH.
Performance
ONLN vs. TMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ONLN
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 5.44%
- 6M
- -7.51%
- YTD
- -1.07%
- 1Y
- 12.81%
- 3Y*
- 19.54%
- 5Y*
- -5.20%
- 10Y*
- —
TMH
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- 2.35%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ONLN vs. TMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ONLN ProShares Online Retail ETF | 0.72% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | -2.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between ONLN and TMH is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ONLN vs. TMH — Risk / Return Rank
ONLN
TMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ONLN vs. TMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Online Retail ETF (ONLN) and Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ONLN | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.45 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ONLN vs. TMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ONLN drawdown since its inception was -71.77%, which is greater than TMH's maximum drawdown of -10.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONLN and TMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ONLN | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.77% | -10.32% | -61.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.94% | -2.78% | -33.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.47% | -5.90% | -29.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.87% | — | — |
Volatility
ONLN vs. TMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ONLN | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.34% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.74% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.77% | 25.94% | -1.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.99% | 25.94% | +7.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.01% | 25.94% | +6.07% |
ONLN vs. TMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ONLN has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than TMH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
ONLN vs. TMH - Dividend Comparison
ONLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than TMH's 4.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ONLN ProShares Online Retail ETF | 0.29% | 0.30% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.24% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | 4.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ONLN and TMH have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for ONLN.
TMH has the higher dividend yield at 4.87%, compared with 0.29% for ONLN.
ONLN tracks ProShares Online Retail Index, while TMH tracks Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for ONLN and 0.19% for TMH.
Find the right allocation for ONLN and TMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer