PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ONEY vs. NIXT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ONEY vs. NIXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) and Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEY achieves a 14.26% return, which is significantly lower than NIXT's 18.29% return.


ONEY

1D
-0.18%
1M
3.52%
YTD
14.26%
6M
14.38%
1Y
23.42%
3Y*
15.65%
5Y*
8.74%
10Y*
12.04%

NIXT

1D
-1.51%
1M
1.69%
YTD
18.29%
6M
17.24%
1Y
33.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEY vs. NIXT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ONEY
SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF
14.26%7.74%1.68%
NIXT
Research Affiliates Deletions ETF
18.29%4.94%4.89%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEY and NIXT is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2024

0.81

The correlation between ONEY and NIXT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ONEY vs. NIXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEY
ONEY Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
ONEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEY Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEY Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

NIXT
NIXT Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
NIXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NIXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
NIXT Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
NIXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
NIXT Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEY vs. NIXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) and Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ONEYNIXTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.27

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

2.87

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.15

9.69

+1.46

ONEY vs. NIXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEY Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the NIXT Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEY and NIXT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ONEYNIXTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

1.59

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.71

-0.10

Drawdowns

ONEY vs. NIXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEY drawdown since its inception was -46.80%, which is greater than NIXT's maximum drawdown of -27.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEY and NIXT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONEYNIXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.80%

-27.75%

-19.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.61%

-11.71%

+4.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-2.37%

+2.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.98%

-5.96%

+0.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

3.47%

-1.36%

Volatility

ONEY vs. NIXT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) is 2.78%, while Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that ONEY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NIXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONEYNIXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

5.00%

-2.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.42%

14.08%

-5.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.39%

21.24%

-8.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.15%

23.31%

-7.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.87%

23.31%

-3.44%

ONEY vs. NIXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEY has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than NIXT's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ONEY vs. NIXT - Dividend Comparison

ONEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than NIXT's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NIXT
Research Affiliates Deletions ETF
1.35%1.64%1.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ONEY
SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF
2.81%3.15%3.18%3.14%3.17%2.46%2.74%3.17%3.72%10.73%6.31%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


ONEY and NIXT have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NIXT has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to ONEY (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEY dropped -46.80% vs NIXT's -27.75%.

On 1-year performance, NIXT leads with 33.50% vs 23.42% for ONEY. On fees, NIXT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, ONEY has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NIXT has performed better with a 33.50% return vs 23.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NIXT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ONEY.

ONEY has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 1.35% for NIXT.

ONEY tracks Russell 1000 Yield Focused Factor Index, while NIXT tracks Research Affiliates Deletions Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Research Affiliates. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ONEY and 0.09% for NIXT.

ONEY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ONEY and NIXT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer