ONEY vs. EPMV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ONEY (SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF) and EPMV (Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. ONEY is passively managed, while EPMV is actively managed. Over the past year, ONEY returned 23.42% vs 29.98% for EPMV. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ONEY charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for EPMV.

Performance

ONEY vs. EPMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) and Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF (EPMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEY achieves a 14.26% return, which is significantly lower than EPMV's 18.43% return.

ONEY

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 3.52%
• YTD: 14.26%
• 6M: 14.38%
• 1Y: 23.42%
• 3Y*: 15.65%
• 5Y*: 8.74%
• 10Y*: 12.04%

EPMV

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 6.82%
• YTD: 18.43%
• 6M: 19.33%
• 1Y: 29.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEY vs. EPMV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ONEY SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF	14.26%	10.16%
EPMV Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF	18.43%	13.68%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEY and EPMV is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2025	0.85

The correlation between ONEY and EPMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

ONEY vs. EPMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ONEY	EPMV
Industrials	13.9%	21.7%
Energy	13.2%	5.0%
Consumer Defensive	12.2%	1.4%
Consumer Cyclical	11.8%	12.2%
Utilities	10.6%	3.0%
Financial Services	10.2%	18.1%
Real Estate	9.7%	6.4%
Basic Materials	8.2%	6.7%
Technology	4.8%	18.7%
Healthcare	3.8%	6.7%
Communication Services	1.6%	-

Return for Risk

ONEY vs. EPMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEY

ONEY Risk / Return Rank: 58
ONEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
ONEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
ONEY Omega Ratio Rank: 54
ONEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
ONEY Martin Ratio Rank: 62

EPMV

EPMV Risk / Return Rank: 63
EPMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
EPMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
EPMV Omega Ratio Rank: 58
EPMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
EPMV Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEY vs. EPMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) and Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF (EPMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ONEY	EPMV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	1.99	-0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	2.92	-0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.35	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.09	3.43	-0.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.15	11.30	-0.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ONEY vs. EPMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEY Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the EPMV Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEY and EPMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ONEY	EPMV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.90	1.99	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	2.05	-1.44

Drawdowns

ONEY vs. EPMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEY drawdown since its inception was -46.80%, which is greater than EPMV's maximum drawdown of -8.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEY and EPMV.

Drawdown Indicators

	ONEY	EPMV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.80%	-8.78%	-38.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.61%	-8.78%	+1.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.50%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.93%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.80%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.18%	0.00%	-0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.98%	-1.78%	-3.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.11%	2.66%	-0.55%

Volatility

ONEY vs. EPMV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) is 2.78%, while Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF (EPMV) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that ONEY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ONEY	EPMV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.78%	5.29%	-2.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.42%	11.33%	-2.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.39%	15.19%	-2.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.15%	15.48%	+0.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.87%	15.48%	+4.39%

ONEY vs. EPMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEY has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EPMV's 0.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

ONEY vs. EPMV - Dividend Comparison

ONEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than EPMV's 1.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EPMV Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF	1.25%	1.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ONEY SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF	2.81%	3.15%	3.18%	3.14%	3.17%	2.46%	2.74%	3.17%	3.72%	10.73%	6.31%	0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ONEY and EPMV in my portfolio?

ONEY and EPMV have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ONEY or EPMV?

EPMV has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to ONEY (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEY dropped -46.80% vs EPMV's -8.78%.

Which ETF is better, ONEY or EPMV?

On 1-year performance, EPMV leads with 29.98% vs 23.42% for ONEY. On fees, ONEY is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ONEY has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ONEY or EPMV?

Over the 1-year period, EPMV has performed better with a 29.98% return vs 23.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ONEY or EPMV?

ONEY is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for EPMV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ONEY or EPMV?

ONEY has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 1.25% for EPMV.

What is the main difference between ONEY and EPMV?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ONEY and 0.88% for EPMV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EPMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.