PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPMV vs. AVMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPMV vs. AVMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF (EPMV) and Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Value ETF (AVMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPMV achieves a 18.47% return, which is significantly higher than AVMV's 14.92% return.


EPMV

1D
-0.01%
1M
-0.10%
6M
11.69%
YTD
18.47%
1Y
25.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
27.45%

AVMV

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.18%
6M
10.03%
YTD
14.92%
1Y
25.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.17M$4.09M$3.51M
$595.15$435.94$1.33K

EPMV vs. AVMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
EPMV
Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF
18.47%14.19%
AVMV
Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Value ETF
14.92%20.74%

Correlation

The correlation between EPMV and AVMV is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2025

0.91

The correlation between EPMV and AVMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

EPMV vs. AVMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EPMV
AVMV

Financial Services

20.3%
23.6%

Industrials

18.4%
17.5%

Technology

17.4%
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

12.0%
18.3%

Healthcare

8.7%
6.4%

Basic Materials

7.1%
3.5%

Real Estate

7.0%
0.8%

Energy

5.0%
12.5%

Utilities

2.8%
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

1.5%
7.2%

Communication Services

-

1.5%

Financial Services

EPMV
20.3%
AVMV
23.6%

Industrials

EPMV
18.4%
AVMV
17.5%

Technology

EPMV
17.4%
AVMV
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

EPMV
12.0%
AVMV
18.3%

Healthcare

EPMV
8.7%
AVMV
6.4%

Basic Materials

EPMV
7.1%
AVMV
3.5%

Real Estate

EPMV
7.0%
AVMV
0.8%

Energy

EPMV
5.0%
AVMV
12.5%

Utilities

EPMV
2.8%
AVMV
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

EPMV
1.5%
AVMV
7.2%

Communication Services

EPMV

-

AVMV
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPMV vs. AVMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EPMV
EPMV Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
EPMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPMV Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
EPMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPMV Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

AVMV
AVMV Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
AVMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVMV Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
AVMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVMV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EPMV vs. AVMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF (EPMV) and Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Value ETF (AVMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EPMVAVMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.32

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

3.15

-0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.21

10.59

-1.39

EPMV vs. AVMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPMV Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the AVMV Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPMV and AVMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EPMV vs. AVMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPMV drawdown since its inception was -8.78%, smaller than the maximum AVMV drawdown of -24.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPMV and AVMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPMVAVMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.78%

-24.24%

+15.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-7.63%

-1.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-0.68%

-0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.70%

-3.70%

+2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

2.26%

+0.33%

Volatility

EPMV vs. AVMV - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF (EPMV) has a higher volatility of 3.52% compared to Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Value ETF (AVMV) at 2.38%. This indicates that EPMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPMVAVMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

2.38%

+1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.57%

9.14%

+2.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.48%

13.57%

+1.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.35%

17.64%

-2.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.35%

17.64%

-2.29%

EPMV vs. AVMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPMV has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than AVMV's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

EPMV vs. AVMV - Dividend Comparison

EPMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, more than AVMV's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AVMV
Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Value ETF
1.04%1.20%1.30%0.25%
EPMV
Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF
1.25%1.48%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EPMV and AVMV have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EPMV has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to AVMV (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPMV dropped -8.78% vs AVMV's -24.24%.

On 1-year performance, AVMV leads with 25.60% vs 25.47% for EPMV. On fees, AVMV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, AVMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVMV has performed better with a 25.60% return vs 25.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVMV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for EPMV.

EPMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 1.04% for AVMV.

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for EPMV and 0.20% for AVMV.

AVMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPMV and AVMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer