PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ONEV vs. SIXH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ONEV vs. SIXH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) and 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEV achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly lower than SIXH's 7.20% return.


ONEV

1D
0.20%
1M
2.36%
YTD
6.31%
6M
6.47%
1Y
12.08%
3Y*
12.79%
5Y*
7.83%
10Y*
11.19%

SIXH

1D
0.48%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
7.20%
6M
8.70%
1Y
10.61%
3Y*
12.22%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEV vs. SIXH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ONEV
SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF
6.31%8.14%11.76%13.28%-8.15%29.19%31.68%
SIXH
6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF
7.20%9.47%12.06%4.93%6.90%18.37%5.83%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEV and SIXH is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020

0.59

The correlation between ONEV and SIXH shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ONEV vs. SIXH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ONEV
SIXH

Industrials

19.5%
7.8%

Healthcare

13.9%
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

12.7%
6.8%

Financial Services

12.1%
9.7%

Technology

11.0%
20.2%

Utilities

8.9%
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

8.5%
23.2%

Real Estate

5.2%
1.4%

Basic Materials

4.0%
0.1%

Communication Services

2.6%
13.3%

Energy

1.6%
0.1%

Industrials

ONEV
19.5%
SIXH
7.8%

Healthcare

ONEV
13.9%
SIXH
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ONEV
12.7%
SIXH
6.8%

Financial Services

ONEV
12.1%
SIXH
9.7%

Technology

ONEV
11.0%
SIXH
20.2%

Utilities

ONEV
8.9%
SIXH
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

ONEV
8.5%
SIXH
23.2%

Real Estate

ONEV
5.2%
SIXH
1.4%

Basic Materials

ONEV
4.0%
SIXH
0.1%

Communication Services

ONEV
2.6%
SIXH
13.3%

Energy

ONEV
1.6%
SIXH
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ONEV vs. SIXH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEV
ONEV Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
ONEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEV Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEV Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

SIXH
SIXH Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SIXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXH Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXH Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEV vs. SIXH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) and 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ONEVSIXHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.25

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

2.44

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.34

6.25

-0.91

ONEV vs. SIXH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEV Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is comparable to the SIXH Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEV and SIXH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ONEVSIXHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

1.40

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.87

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

1.05

-0.38

Drawdowns

ONEV vs. SIXH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEV drawdown since its inception was -39.72%, which is greater than SIXH's maximum drawdown of -11.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEV and SIXH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONEVSIXHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.72%

-11.68%

-28.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.75%

-4.36%

-3.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.81%

-9.10%

-5.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.52%

-11.68%

-6.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-2.42%

+1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.90%

-1.85%

-2.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

1.70%

+0.57%

Volatility

ONEV vs. SIXH - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) has a higher volatility of 2.63% compared to 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) at 2.31%. This indicates that ONEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONEVSIXHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

2.31%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.73%

6.02%

+1.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.20%

7.60%

+3.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.54%

10.37%

+4.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.02%

10.15%

+6.87%

ONEV vs. SIXH - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXH's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

ONEV vs. SIXH - Dividend Comparison

ONEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than SIXH's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ONEV
SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF
1.76%1.81%1.88%1.79%1.80%1.44%1.87%2.07%2.14%6.91%3.73%0.21%
SIXH
6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF
1.90%2.23%1.55%2.04%2.06%1.65%1.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ONEV and SIXH have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ONEV has higher volatility (2.63%) compared to SIXH (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEV dropped -39.72% vs SIXH's -11.68%.

On 5-year performance, SIXH leads with 8.95% vs 7.83% for ONEV. On fees, ONEV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SIXH has been the lower-risk option at 2.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SIXH has performed better with a 8.95% return vs 7.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ONEV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SIXH.

SIXH has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 1.76% for ONEV.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ONEV and 0.87% for SIXH.

SIXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ONEV and SIXH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer