ONEV vs. SIXH
ONEV (SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF) and SIXH (6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF) are both Volatility Hedged Equity funds. ONEV is passively managed, while SIXH is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ONEV returned 7.83%/yr vs 8.95%/yr for SIXH. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ONEV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for SIXH.
Performance
ONEV vs. SIXH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ONEV achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly lower than SIXH's 7.20% return.
ONEV
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 2.36%
- YTD
- 6.31%
- 6M
- 6.47%
- 1Y
- 12.08%
- 3Y*
- 12.79%
- 5Y*
- 7.83%
- 10Y*
- 11.19%
SIXH
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 7.20%
- 6M
- 8.70%
- 1Y
- 10.61%
- 3Y*
- 12.22%
- 5Y*
- 8.95%
- 10Y*
- —
ONEV vs. SIXH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ONEV SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF | 6.31% | 8.14% | 11.76% | 13.28% | -8.15% | 29.19% | 31.68% |
SIXH 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF | 7.20% | 9.47% | 12.06% | 4.93% | 6.90% | 18.37% | 5.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between ONEV and SIXH is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020 | 0.59 |
The correlation between ONEV and SIXH shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ONEV vs. SIXH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ONEV
SIXH
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Technology
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Industrials
ONEV
SIXH
Healthcare
ONEV
SIXH
Consumer Cyclical
ONEV
SIXH
Financial Services
ONEV
SIXH
Technology
ONEV
SIXH
Utilities
ONEV
SIXH
Consumer Defensive
ONEV
SIXH
Real Estate
ONEV
SIXH
Basic Materials
ONEV
SIXH
Communication Services
ONEV
SIXH
Energy
ONEV
SIXH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ONEV vs. SIXH — Risk / Return Rank
ONEV
SIXH
ONEV vs. SIXH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) and 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ONEV | SIXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.25 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 2.44 | -0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.34 | 6.25 | -0.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ONEV | SIXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 1.40 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.87 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 1.05 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
ONEV vs. SIXH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ONEV drawdown since its inception was -39.72%, which is greater than SIXH's maximum drawdown of -11.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEV and SIXH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ONEV | SIXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.72% | -11.68% | -28.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.75% | -4.36% | -3.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.81% | -9.10% | -5.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.52% | -11.68% | -6.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.99% | -2.42% | +1.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.90% | -1.85% | -2.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 1.70% | +0.57% |
Volatility
ONEV vs. SIXH - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) has a higher volatility of 2.63% compared to 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) at 2.31%. This indicates that ONEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ONEV | SIXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 2.31% | +0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.73% | 6.02% | +1.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.20% | 7.60% | +3.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.54% | 10.37% | +4.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.02% | 10.15% | +6.87% |
ONEV vs. SIXH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ONEV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXH's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
ONEV vs. SIXH - Dividend Comparison
ONEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than SIXH's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ONEV SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF | 1.76% | 1.81% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.80% | 1.44% | 1.87% | 2.07% | 2.14% | 6.91% | 3.73% | 0.21% |
SIXH 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF | 1.90% | 2.23% | 1.55% | 2.04% | 2.06% | 1.65% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ONEV and SIXH have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ONEV has higher volatility (2.63%) compared to SIXH (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEV dropped -39.72% vs SIXH's -11.68%.
On 5-year performance, SIXH leads with 8.95% vs 7.83% for ONEV. On fees, ONEV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SIXH has been the lower-risk option at 2.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SIXH has performed better with a 8.95% return vs 7.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ONEV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SIXH.
SIXH has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 1.76% for ONEV.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ONEV and 0.87% for SIXH.
SIXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ONEV and SIXH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer