ONEV vs. FMDE
ONEV (SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF) and FMDE (Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ONEV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focused Factor (TR), while FMDE is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. ONEV is passively managed, while FMDE is actively managed. Over the past year, ONEV returned 11.90% vs 17.86% for FMDE. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ONEV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for FMDE.
Performance
ONEV vs. FMDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ONEV achieves a 6.35% return, which is significantly lower than FMDE's 8.21% return.
ONEV
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 6.35%
- 6M
- 7.34%
- 1Y
- 11.90%
- 3Y*
- 12.57%
- 5Y*
- 7.94%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
FMDE
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 8.21%
- 6M
- 8.53%
- 1Y
- 17.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ONEV vs. FMDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ONEV SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF | 6.35% | 8.14% | 11.76% | 6.91% |
FMDE Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF | 8.21% | 12.19% | 21.76% | 8.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between ONEV and FMDE is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023 | 0.85 |
The correlation between ONEV and FMDE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
ONEV vs. FMDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ONEV
FMDE
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Technology
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Industrials
ONEV
FMDE
Healthcare
ONEV
FMDE
Consumer Cyclical
ONEV
FMDE
Financial Services
ONEV
FMDE
Technology
ONEV
FMDE
Utilities
ONEV
FMDE
Consumer Defensive
ONEV
FMDE
Real Estate
ONEV
FMDE
Basic Materials
ONEV
FMDE
Communication Services
ONEV
FMDE
Energy
ONEV
FMDE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ONEV vs. FMDE — Risk / Return Rank
ONEV
FMDE
ONEV vs. FMDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) and Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ONEV | FMDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.23 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 2.15 | -0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.26 | 8.49 | -3.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ONEV | FMDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 1.31 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 1.28 | -0.62 |
Drawdowns
ONEV vs. FMDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ONEV drawdown since its inception was -39.72%, which is greater than FMDE's maximum drawdown of -21.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEV and FMDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ONEV | FMDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.72% | -21.10% | -18.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.75% | -8.33% | +0.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.94% | -2.19% | +1.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.90% | -2.64% | -1.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 2.11% | +0.16% |
Volatility
ONEV vs. FMDE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) is 2.35%, while Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE) has a volatility of 3.52%. This indicates that ONEV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ONEV | FMDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.35% | 3.52% | -1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.74% | 10.03% | -2.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.19% | 13.75% | -2.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.54% | 16.15% | -1.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 16.15% | +0.88% |
ONEV vs. FMDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ONEV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FMDE's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ONEV vs. FMDE - Dividend Comparison
ONEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than FMDE's 1.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMDE Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF | 1.13% | 1.23% | 1.11% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ONEV SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF | 1.76% | 1.81% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.80% | 1.44% | 1.87% | 2.07% | 2.14% | 6.91% | 3.73% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ONEV and FMDE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FMDE has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to ONEV (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEV dropped -39.72% vs FMDE's -21.10%.
On 1-year performance, FMDE leads with 17.86% vs 11.90% for ONEV. On fees, ONEV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ONEV has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FMDE has performed better with a 17.86% return vs 11.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ONEV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for FMDE.
ONEV has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.13% for FMDE.
ONEV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while FMDE is Mid Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ONEV and 0.23% for FMDE.
FMDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ONEV and FMDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer