ONEV vs. FDLO
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) and Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO).
ONEV and FDLO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ONEV is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focused Factor (TR). It was launched on Dec 2, 2015. FDLO is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Factor Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2016. Both ONEV and FDLO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ONEV or FDLO.
Key characteristics
| ONEV | FDLO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 2.37% | 2.33% |
| 1Y Return | 13.38% | 13.22% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.86% | 6.90% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.22% | 10.78% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.04 | 1.35 |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.61% | 9.00% |
| Max Drawdown | -39.72% | -34.35% |
| Current Drawdown | -6.02% | -3.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between ONEV and FDLO is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ONEV vs. FDLO - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ONEV having a 2.37% return and FDLO slightly lower at 2.33%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ONEV vs. FDLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ONEV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FDLO's 0.29% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ONEV vs. FDLO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) and Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ONEV vs. FDLO - Dividend Comparison
ONEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, more than FDLO's 1.36% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ONEV SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF | 1.79% | 1.79% | 1.80% | 1.44% | 1.87% | 2.07% | 2.14% | 6.91% | 2.02% | 0.08% |
FDLO Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF | 1.36% | 1.35% | 1.49% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.55% | 1.76% | 1.61% | 0.55% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ONEV vs. FDLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ONEV drawdown since its inception was -39.72%, which is greater than FDLO's maximum drawdown of -34.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEV and FDLO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ONEV vs. FDLO - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) has a higher volatility of 3.18% compared to Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) at 2.40%. This indicates that ONEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.