PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ONEV vs. EELV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ONEV vs. EELV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEV achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly higher than EELV's 3.97% return. Over the past 10 years, ONEV has outperformed EELV with an annualized return of 11.19%, while EELV has yielded a comparatively lower 6.56% annualized return.


ONEV

1D
0.20%
1M
2.36%
YTD
6.31%
6M
6.47%
1Y
12.08%
3Y*
12.79%
5Y*
7.83%
10Y*
11.19%

EELV

1D
-0.84%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
3.97%
6M
5.13%
1Y
14.46%
3Y*
10.69%
5Y*
6.82%
10Y*
6.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEV vs. EELV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ONEV
SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF
6.31%8.14%11.76%13.28%-8.15%29.19%6.66%30.66%-5.30%18.11%
EELV
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF
3.97%21.97%1.90%8.85%-3.98%16.15%-3.89%8.89%-5.40%24.89%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEV and EELV is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2015

0.50

The correlation between ONEV and EELV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

ONEV vs. EELV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ONEV
EELV

Industrials

19.5%
8.9%

Healthcare

13.9%
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

12.7%
3.8%

Financial Services

12.1%
37.4%

Technology

11.0%
0.2%

Utilities

8.9%
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

8.5%
10.8%

Real Estate

5.2%
2.6%

Basic Materials

4.0%
5.3%

Communication Services

2.6%
9.6%

Energy

1.6%
6.5%

Industrials

ONEV
19.5%
EELV
8.9%

Healthcare

ONEV
13.9%
EELV
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

ONEV
12.7%
EELV
3.8%

Financial Services

ONEV
12.1%
EELV
37.4%

Technology

ONEV
11.0%
EELV
0.2%

Utilities

ONEV
8.9%
EELV
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

ONEV
8.5%
EELV
10.8%

Real Estate

ONEV
5.2%
EELV
2.6%

Basic Materials

ONEV
4.0%
EELV
5.3%

Communication Services

ONEV
2.6%
EELV
9.6%

Energy

ONEV
1.6%
EELV
6.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ONEV vs. EELV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEV
ONEV Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
ONEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEV Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEV Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

EELV
EELV Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
EELV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EELV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
EELV Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
EELV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
EELV Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEV vs. EELV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ONEVEELVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.08

1.34

-0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.67

1.91

-0.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.24

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

1.77

-0.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.34

5.99

-0.65

ONEV vs. EELV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEV Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is comparable to the EELV Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEV and EELV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ONEVEELVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

1.34

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.60

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.48

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.30

+0.37

Drawdowns

ONEV vs. EELV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEV drawdown since its inception was -39.72%, which is greater than EELV's maximum drawdown of -36.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEV and EELV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONEVEELVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.72%

-36.35%

-3.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.75%

-8.22%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.81%

-11.79%

-3.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.52%

-19.04%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.72%

-36.35%

-3.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-4.71%

+3.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.90%

-8.93%

+5.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

2.42%

-0.15%

Volatility

ONEV vs. EELV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) is 2.63%, while Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV) has a volatility of 3.40%. This indicates that ONEV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EELV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONEVEELVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

3.40%

-0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.73%

9.03%

-1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.20%

10.87%

+0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.54%

11.36%

+3.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.02%

13.64%

+3.38%

ONEV vs. EELV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EELV's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

ONEV vs. EELV - Dividend Comparison

ONEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than EELV's 3.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EELV
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF
3.60%3.75%4.70%4.00%3.45%4.35%2.82%3.14%5.50%2.92%2.29%2.53%
ONEV
SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF
1.76%1.81%1.88%1.79%1.80%1.44%1.87%2.07%2.14%6.91%3.73%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


ONEV and EELV have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EELV has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to ONEV (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEV dropped -39.72% vs EELV's -36.35%.

On 10-year performance, ONEV leads with 11.19% vs 6.56% for EELV. On fees, ONEV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ONEV has been the lower-risk option at 2.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ONEV has performed better with a 11.19% return vs 6.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ONEV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EELV.

EELV has the higher dividend yield at 3.60%, compared with 1.76% for ONEV.

ONEV tracks Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focused Factor (TR), while EELV tracks S&P BMI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ONEV and 0.30% for EELV.

EELV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ONEV and EELV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer