ONEV vs. EELV
ONEV (SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF) and EELV (Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF) are both Volatility Hedged Equity funds - ONEV tracks the Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focused Factor (TR) while EELV tracks the S&P BMI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ONEV returned 11.19%/yr vs 6.56%/yr for EELV. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ONEV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EELV.
Performance
ONEV vs. EELV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ONEV achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly higher than EELV's 3.97% return. Over the past 10 years, ONEV has outperformed EELV with an annualized return of 11.19%, while EELV has yielded a comparatively lower 6.56% annualized return.
ONEV
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 2.36%
- YTD
- 6.31%
- 6M
- 6.47%
- 1Y
- 12.08%
- 3Y*
- 12.79%
- 5Y*
- 7.83%
- 10Y*
- 11.19%
EELV
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 3.97%
- 6M
- 5.13%
- 1Y
- 14.46%
- 3Y*
- 10.69%
- 5Y*
- 6.82%
- 10Y*
- 6.56%
ONEV vs. EELV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ONEV SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF | 6.31% | 8.14% | 11.76% | 13.28% | -8.15% | 29.19% | 6.66% | 30.66% | -5.30% | 18.11% |
EELV Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF | 3.97% | 21.97% | 1.90% | 8.85% | -3.98% | 16.15% | -3.89% | 8.89% | -5.40% | 24.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between ONEV and EELV is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2015 | 0.50 |
The correlation between ONEV and EELV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
ONEV vs. EELV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ONEV
EELV
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Technology
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Industrials
ONEV
EELV
Healthcare
ONEV
EELV
Consumer Cyclical
ONEV
EELV
Financial Services
ONEV
EELV
Technology
ONEV
EELV
Utilities
ONEV
EELV
Consumer Defensive
ONEV
EELV
Real Estate
ONEV
EELV
Basic Materials
ONEV
EELV
Communication Services
ONEV
EELV
Energy
ONEV
EELV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ONEV vs. EELV — Risk / Return Rank
ONEV
EELV
ONEV vs. EELV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ONEV | EELV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.08 | 1.34 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.67 | 1.91 | -0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.24 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 1.77 | -0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.34 | 5.99 | -0.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ONEV | EELV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 1.34 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.60 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.48 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.30 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
ONEV vs. EELV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ONEV drawdown since its inception was -39.72%, which is greater than EELV's maximum drawdown of -36.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEV and EELV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ONEV | EELV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.72% | -36.35% | -3.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.75% | -8.22% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.81% | -11.79% | -3.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.52% | -19.04% | +0.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.72% | -36.35% | -3.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.99% | -4.71% | +3.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.90% | -8.93% | +5.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 2.42% | -0.15% |
Volatility
ONEV vs. EELV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) is 2.63%, while Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV) has a volatility of 3.40%. This indicates that ONEV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EELV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ONEV | EELV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 3.40% | -0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.73% | 9.03% | -1.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.20% | 10.87% | +0.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.54% | 11.36% | +3.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.02% | 13.64% | +3.38% |
ONEV vs. EELV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ONEV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EELV's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
ONEV vs. EELV - Dividend Comparison
ONEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than EELV's 3.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EELV Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF | 3.60% | 3.75% | 4.70% | 4.00% | 3.45% | 4.35% | 2.82% | 3.14% | 5.50% | 2.92% | 2.29% | 2.53% |
ONEV SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF | 1.76% | 1.81% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.80% | 1.44% | 1.87% | 2.07% | 2.14% | 6.91% | 3.73% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ONEV and EELV have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EELV has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to ONEV (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEV dropped -39.72% vs EELV's -36.35%.
On 10-year performance, ONEV leads with 11.19% vs 6.56% for EELV. On fees, ONEV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ONEV has been the lower-risk option at 2.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ONEV has performed better with a 11.19% return vs 6.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ONEV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EELV.
EELV has the higher dividend yield at 3.60%, compared with 1.76% for ONEV.
ONEV tracks Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focused Factor (TR), while EELV tracks S&P BMI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ONEV and 0.30% for EELV.
EELV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ONEV and EELV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer