PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ONEQ vs. QARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ONEQ vs. QARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEQ achieves a 12.09% return, which is significantly lower than QARP's 12.78% return.


ONEQ

1D
-1.55%
1M
-1.91%
6M
10.71%
YTD
12.09%
1Y
26.00%
3Y*
23.06%
5Y*
13.59%
10Y*
18.95%

QARP

1D
0.71%
1M
1.10%
6M
9.34%
YTD
12.78%
1Y
25.00%
3Y*
17.33%
5Y*
12.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEQ vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
12.09%20.89%29.30%45.73%-32.12%22.11%44.87%38.01%-5.35%
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
12.78%13.99%18.94%23.03%-14.62%31.82%14.83%30.70%-5.53%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEQ and QARP is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018

0.83

The correlation between ONEQ and QARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

ONEQ vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ONEQ
QARP

Technology

54.3%
23.5%

Communication Services

15.4%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.7%
9.6%

Healthcare

4.7%
13.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
9.6%

Financial Services

2.9%
12.1%

Industrials

2.9%
8.5%

Basic Materials

0.9%
2.3%

Utilities

0.8%
2.0%

Real Estate

0.6%
1.0%

Energy

0.5%
5.8%

Technology

ONEQ
54.3%
QARP
23.5%

Communication Services

ONEQ
15.4%
QARP
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ONEQ
12.7%
QARP
9.6%

Healthcare

ONEQ
4.7%
QARP
13.9%

Consumer Defensive

ONEQ
4.4%
QARP
9.6%

Financial Services

ONEQ
2.9%
QARP
12.1%

Industrials

ONEQ
2.9%
QARP
8.5%

Basic Materials

ONEQ
0.9%
QARP
2.3%

Utilities

ONEQ
0.8%
QARP
2.0%

Real Estate

ONEQ
0.6%
QARP
1.0%

Energy

ONEQ
0.5%
QARP
5.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ONEQ vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEQ
ONEQ Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
ONEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

QARP
QARP Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
QARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
QARP Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
QARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
QARP Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEQ vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ONEQQARPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.43

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

3.46

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.46

15.38

-7.92

ONEQ vs. QARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the QARP Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEQ and QARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ONEQ vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEQ drawdown since its inception was -55.09%, which is greater than QARP's maximum drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEQ and QARP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONEQQARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.09%

-35.44%

-19.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.64%

-7.26%

-5.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.09%

-15.65%

-8.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.23%

-22.75%

-12.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.32%

0.00%

-4.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.93%

-4.39%

-3.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

1.63%

+1.86%

Volatility

ONEQ vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) has a higher volatility of 5.81% compared to Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) at 2.76%. This indicates that ONEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONEQQARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.81%

2.76%

+3.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.21%

8.22%

+5.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.76%

10.58%

+7.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.42%

15.54%

+6.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.78%

19.55%

+2.23%

ONEQ vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEQ has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ONEQ vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison

ONEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than QARP's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
0.86%0.54%0.65%0.71%0.97%0.54%0.71%2.51%1.08%0.84%1.12%1.04%
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
1.02%1.14%1.39%1.28%1.68%1.34%1.61%1.85%1.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ONEQ and QARP have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ONEQ has higher volatility (5.81%) compared to QARP (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEQ dropped -55.09% vs QARP's -35.44%.

On 5-year performance, ONEQ leads with 13.59% vs 12.09% for QARP. On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ONEQ has performed better with a 13.59% return vs 12.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for ONEQ.

QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.86% for ONEQ.

ONEQ tracks Nasdaq Composite Index, while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for ONEQ and 0.19% for QARP.

QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ONEQ and QARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer